Optimizing filler content in an adhesive system containing pre-reacted glass-ionomer fillers

Ikemura, Kunio; Tay, Franklin R.; Kouro, Yoshiaki; Endō, Takeshi; Yoshiyama, Masahiro; Miyai, K.; Pashley, David H.

doi:10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00022-2

Cited by 74 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This resin composite was developed to exhibit structural strength and release ions (26). The use of S-PRG fillers promotes rapid fluoride release through ligand exchanges between fluoride ions and counter cations within the prereacted hydrogel (13). In addition to F − , S-PRG fillers release Al , and Sr 2+ ions (27).…”

Section: Secondary Caries Alpha No Clinical Diagnosis Of Caries Bravomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This S-PRG filler has a layered structure consisting of a fluoroboroaluminosilicate glass core, reacted layers forming a glass ionomer phase on the surface of the core, and a reinforced layer covering the surface of the prereacted phase (13,14). Resin composites containing S-PRG fillers are used in combination with self-etch adhesives, which partially dissolve the smear layer without demineralizing the dentin as deeply as etch-and-rinse systems.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Three-year clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations placed with a single-step self-etch adhesive

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Secondary Caries Alpha No Clinical Diagnosis Of Caries Bravomentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-year clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations placed with a single-step self-etch adhesive

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The S-PRG filler particles are formed by an acid-base reaction of fluoroaluminosilicate glass with polyacrylic acid 10) and have been found to be capable of fluoride release and recharge 11) . Similarly, the composite resin containing S-PRG filler also had fluoride release and recharge functions 12) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to examine the antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles versus that of contemporary commercial composite resins. Three composite resins were used: Beautifil II (containing S-PRG filler), Clearfil AP-X, and Filtek Z250. Resin blocks were bonded to maxillary first molars, and plaque accumulation on the resin block surface was examined after 8 hours. For the antibacterial test, the number of Streptococcus mutans in contact with the composite resin blocks after incubation for 12 hours was determined, and adherence of radiolabeled bacteria was evaluated. Less dental plaque was formed on Beautifil II resin block as compared to the other two materials. Antibacterial test revealed that there were no significant differences in the number of Streptococcus mutans among the three composite resins. However, the adherence of radiolabeled bacteria to the saliva-treated resin surface was significantly (p<0.01) lower in Beautifil II than in the other two materials. These results suggested that Beautifil II could reduce dental plaque formation and bacterial adherence, leading to prevention of secondary caries.

show abstract

“…In 2000, Shofu Inc. (Kyoto, Japan) developed an innovative filler technology of resin composite that created a stable Glass-ionomer phase on a glass core in which they induced an acid-base reaction between acidreactive fluoride containing glass and polycarboxylic acid in the presence of water -developed as a Pre-Reacted Glass-ionomer (PRG) filler [1][2][3] . This PRG technology was applied to the filler component of resin composite materials to provide a bioactive result that released and was recharged with fluoride -like a traditional glassionomer cement-all the while maintaining the original physical properties of the resin composite system 4,5) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An eighteen-month clinical evaluation of posterior restorations with fluoride releasing adhesive and composite systems

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the clinical performance of a fluoride releasing restorative system (FL-Bond II & Beautifil II) in posterior restorations after 18-month placement. IRB forms were submitted with each patient approving by signing their acceptance. Seven Class I and 46 Class II restorations were placed by three clinicians in 38-patients. Each FL-Bond II & Beautifil II restoration was placed under rubber dam isolation according to manufacture's instruction. Clinical evaluation was assessed at baseline, 6 and 18-months using modified USPHS criteria. No post-operative sensitivity was reported in any restored tooth at each patient assessment. Only slight color change with some surface staining was noted. Slight marginal changes were observed in 12 of 53-restorations -seen as step irregularities when a sharp explorer was drawn across the tooth from the enamel toward the restoration interface. Utilizing USPHS evaluation criteria, the clinical performance of each (FL-Bond II & Beautifil II) posterior fluoride releasing system was clinically acceptable at 18-month.

show abstract

Optimizing filler content in an adhesive system containing pre-reacted glass-ionomer fillers

Cited by 74 publications

References 36 publications

Three-year clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations placed with a single-step self-etch adhesive

Three-year clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations placed with a single-step self-etch adhesive

Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles

An eighteen-month clinical evaluation of posterior restorations with fluoride releasing adhesive and composite systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About