2009
DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.3112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing experimental design, overcoming challenges, and gaining valuable information from the Sb K-edge XANES region

Abstract: There are many challenges associated with collecting, processing, and interpreting high-energy XAS data. The most significant of these are broad spectra, minimal separation of edge positions, and high background owing to the Compton tail. Studies of the Sb system are a particular challenge owing to its complex bonding character and formation of mixed oxidation-state minerals. Furthermore, in environmental samples such as stream sediment containing mine waste, different Sb phases may coexist. Ways to overcome t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(63 reference statements)
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear combination fitting analysis (LCF) was used to fit a combination of model compounds to unknown spectra using the Athena program in the IFEFFIT package. This approach is commonly used to determine the relative proportions of model compounds present in heterogenous samples (Fawcett et al, 2009). An energy range of −100 to 150 eV from the K-edge of Sb was used to fit the soil sample with respect to standard references.…”
Section: Analysis Of Sb Speciation Using X-ray Absorption Near Edge Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear combination fitting analysis (LCF) was used to fit a combination of model compounds to unknown spectra using the Athena program in the IFEFFIT package. This approach is commonly used to determine the relative proportions of model compounds present in heterogenous samples (Fawcett et al, 2009). An energy range of −100 to 150 eV from the K-edge of Sb was used to fit the soil sample with respect to standard references.…”
Section: Analysis Of Sb Speciation Using X-ray Absorption Near Edge Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear combination fitting analysis (LCF) was used to fit a combination of model compounds to unknown spectra. This approach is commonly used to determine the relative proportions of model compounds present in heterogeneous samples (Fawcett et al, 2009). Spectra from the reference compounds Sb 2 S 3 , Sb 2 O 3 , Sb 2 O 5 and Ca[Sb(OH) 6 ] 2 were used for the LCF analysis.…”
Section: X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure (Xanes) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lies between the peak maximum of the reference materials Ca [Sb(OH) 6 ] 2 (30 502.9 eV) and Sb 2 O 3 (30 500.1 eV), which indicates the presence of both valence states in the samples. However, it is not possible to distinguish between mixed-oxidation state minerals and single minerals containing Sb(III) or Sb(V) (Fawcett et al, 2009). …”
Section: Xanes Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this resolution is less than for other elements with K-edges at lower energies, such as arsenic, the first derivative of the normalised energy spectra allows reliable oxidation state discrimination by linear combination fitting. [15] In contrast, distinguishing the local coordination environment is more challenging, with absorption edge energies of Sb III -O and Sb III -S, for example, separated by only 1.2 eV (Table S3). Fawcett et al [15] claimed that linear combination fitting of the first derivative of the normalised energy spectra could reliably differentiate Sb III -O and Sb III -S in a natural sediment sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] In contrast, distinguishing the local coordination environment is more challenging, with absorption edge energies of Sb III -O and Sb III -S, for example, separated by only 1.2 eV (Table S3). Fawcett et al [15] claimed that linear combination fitting of the first derivative of the normalised energy spectra could reliably differentiate Sb III -O and Sb III -S in a natural sediment sample. However, this analysis did not include a robust statistical assessment of fit quality, nor did the standards Fawcett et al used for Sb III -S (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%