2011
DOI: 10.1159/000331392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Dynamic Interactions between a Cardiac Patch and Inflammatory Host Cells

Abstract: gineering modalities for cardiac repair, the host environment into which the repair cells are placed is largely overlooked. Within seconds of myocardial ischemia, hypoxia sets in in the myocardium and the inflammatory response starts, characterized by rapid deployment of circulating cells and the release of paracrine and autocrine signals. Therefore, the inflammatory conditions under which these interactions take place, the design of the scaffold material used, and the maturity of the implanted cells will dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a suitable polymeric scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering should demonstrate an appropriate biodegradation life-time while, at the same time, promote wall motion recovery and induce restorative processes (angiogenesis and accelerated healing). In this context, a BM that induces a shift in the balance of infiltrating macrophages to an M2 phenotype would be preferred, since the activation of an M1 macrophage response is typically associated with transplant rejection and chronic inflammation, while M2 macrophages are thought to participate in tissue remodeling and transplant tolerance [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a suitable polymeric scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering should demonstrate an appropriate biodegradation life-time while, at the same time, promote wall motion recovery and induce restorative processes (angiogenesis and accelerated healing). In this context, a BM that induces a shift in the balance of infiltrating macrophages to an M2 phenotype would be preferred, since the activation of an M1 macrophage response is typically associated with transplant rejection and chronic inflammation, while M2 macrophages are thought to participate in tissue remodeling and transplant tolerance [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secretion of these factors over a short period of time can lead to device failure, limiting the beneficial effect of regenerative SCs. In fact, this reaction commonly occurs during the healing process after MI or following biomaterial implantation [27,28]. Thus, since our SCs demonstrated long-term structural integrity in the cardiac tissue, it may indicate that the immunological response was not damaging to the biomaterials and that prolonged cytokine release occurred.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…To date, approaches to cardiac tissue engineering range from injectable hydrogel to construction of complex cardiac constructs. 16 Intramuscular injections have variable outcomes due to low biomaterials retention at the site of injection. 17 Implanting engineered cardiac patch represents a promising strategy for cardiac tissue engineering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%