2007
DOI: 10.2175/193317707x224095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Disinfection of Wet Weather Flows Not Receiving Biological Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both CoMF media were tested in Springfield, OH at a pilot facility (100 MGD, 10 gpm/ft 2 ) for CSO treatment where average effluent concentrations were 22 mg/L TSS and 26 mg/L CBOD 5 (Fitzpatrick et al, 2011). Another CoMF installation for CSO treatment in Atlanta, GA (10-27 gpm/ft 2 ), consistently achieved 90% TSS removal (Arnett et al, 2007).…”
Section: Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both CoMF media were tested in Springfield, OH at a pilot facility (100 MGD, 10 gpm/ft 2 ) for CSO treatment where average effluent concentrations were 22 mg/L TSS and 26 mg/L CBOD 5 (Fitzpatrick et al, 2011). Another CoMF installation for CSO treatment in Atlanta, GA (10-27 gpm/ft 2 ), consistently achieved 90% TSS removal (Arnett et al, 2007).…”
Section: Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One issue with remote operation is that solids accumulate and must be continuously removed or stored on‐site (King County Wastewater Treatment Division, 2011). Vortex separators also can be designed with chemical coagulants or disinfectants to improve treatment (AECOM, 2006; Arnett et al, 2007).…”
Section: Current Cso Management and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%