2000
DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200006000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing cuff width for noninvasive measurement of blood pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study comparing intra-arterial and auscultatory blood pressure concluded that the error is minimized with a cuff width of 46% of the arm circumference. 84 The recommended cuff sizes are:…”
Section: Cuff Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study comparing intra-arterial and auscultatory blood pressure concluded that the error is minimized with a cuff width of 46% of the arm circumference. 84 The recommended cuff sizes are:…”
Section: Cuff Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study that examined this issue was published by Marks and Groch, 4 who measured blood pressure directly from the radial artery and indirectly from the brachial artery in 50 subjects who were in an intensive care unit and had intra-arterial lines as part of their routine care. The average arm circumference of these patients was 29.7 cm, and the published figure show that the highest circumference was 37 cm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly encountered difficulty is use of an improper size oscillometric upper arm cuff. Any reliable measurement NIBP is strictly dependent on the choice of a correct-sized cuff [7]. It is particularly important to place the center of the bladder over the brachial artery pulse.…”
Section: Arterial Line or Non-invasivementioning
confidence: 99%