Optimizing Chien Search Usage in the BCH Decoder for High Error Rate Transmission

ElDin, Ramy Taki; El-Hassani, Rabab M. I.; Elramly, Salwa

doi:10.1109/lcomm.2013.022213.122651

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…DVB-S2 QEF performance is achieved after a pre-determined number of iterations i max = 50 [38]. Moreover, the computational complexity of BCH encoding, and decoding are O t √ K bch , O t √ N bch respectively [53][54][55], where t is the BCH error correction capability.…”

Section: System Complexity Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimized Polar Codes as Forward Error Correction Coding for Digital Video Broadcasting Systems

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Polar codes are featured by their low encoding/decoding complexity for symmetric binary input-discrete memoryless channels. Recently, flexible generic Successive Cancellation List (SCL) decoders for polar codes were proposed to provide different throughput, latency, and decoding performances. In this paper, we propose to use polar codes with flexible fast-adaptive SCL decoders in Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) systems to meet the growing demand for more bitrates. In addition, they can provide more interactive services with less latency and more throughput. First, we start with the construction of polar codes and propose a new mathematical relation to get the optimized design point for the polar code. We prove that our optimized design point is too close to the one that achieves minimum Bit Error Rate (BER). Then, we compare the performance of polar and Low-Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes in terms of BER, encoder/decoder latencies, and throughput. The results show that both channel coding techniques have comparable BER. However, polar codes are superior to LDPC in terms of decoding latency, and system throughput. Finally, we present the possible performance enhancement of DVB systems in terms of decoding latency and complexity when using optimized polar codes as a Forward Error Correction (FEC) technique instead of Bose Chaudhuri Hocquenghem (BCH) and LDPC codes that are currently adopted in DVB standards.

show abstract

Section: System Complexity Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 99%