Optimizing Assisted Communication Devices for Children With Motor Impairments Using a Model of Information Rate and Channel Capacity

Abstract

For children who depend on devices to communicate, the rate of communication is a primary determinant of success. For children with motor impairments, the rate of communication may be limited by inability to contact buttons or cells rapidly or accurately. It is, therefore, essential to know how to adjust the device interface in order to maximize each child's rate of communication. The optimal rate of communication is determined by the channel capacity, which is the maximum value of the information rate for all possible keyboard button or cell layouts for the communication device. We construct a mathematical model for the information rate based on the relationship between movement time and the number of buttons per screen, the size of the buttons, and the length of a sequence of buttons that must be pressed to communicate each word in the vocabulary. We measure the parameters of the model using a custom-programmed touchscreen interface in 10 children with disorders of arm movement due to cerebral palsy who use a DynaVox communication device. We measure the same parameters in 20 healthy control subjects. We show that the model approximates the measured information rate and that the information rate is lower in children with motor impairments compared with control subjects. The theory predicts that for each child there is a combination of button size and number that maximizes the predicted information rate and thereby achieves communication at the optimal channel capacity. Programming communication devices with each child's predicted optimal parameters improved the communication rate in five of the ten children, compared with programming by professionals. Therefore, measurement of information rate may provide an assessment of the effect of motor disorders on success in assisted communication. Optimization of the information rate may be useful for programming assisted communication devices.

Speed-Accuracy Testing on the Apple iPad® Provides a Quantitative Test of Upper Extremity Motor Performance in Children with Dystonia

“…Later, ISO 9241-9 (ISO, 2002; MacKenzie and Soukoreff, 2003) has introduced the Throughput ( TP ) in HCI design as a further metric in quantifying input system performance (see Methods for mathematical description). Fitts’ law has recently been applied in optimizing the layout of AAC devices for children with CP using a mathematical model for information based on the relationship between movement time and buttons size (Sanger and Henderson, 2007). …”

Conception and Experimentation of a Communication Device with Adaptive Scanning

“…These performances are a function of the user's physical and cognitive abilities, in particular his/her average response time inducing the scanning time of the graphical and alphabetical interface. They are also related to the distribution of icons on the screens as well as the method of accessing them [Abascal et al 2004;Biswas and Robinson 2007;Evreinov and Raisamo 2004;Sanger and Henderson 2007;Schadle et al 2004]. In that context, the model of the human-machine interaction can, on the one hand, facilitate the analysis of the operation of the human-machine system and, on the other hand, make predicting its performance possible.…”

“…In this case the user is modeled on the basis of the MHP (Model Human Processor) model that was developed originally by Card et al for microcomputing tasks with low cognitive content (i.e., responding to stimuli) [Card et al 1983]. Finally, Sanger and Henderson [2007], for the purpose of optimizing the configuration of a communication keyboard, have modeled the human-machine interaction by evaluating the capacity of the transmission channel in relation to the paradigm derived from Shannon's theory of information.…”

On the use of a multimedia platform for music education with handicapped children: A case study

“…To achieve this goal, PLAIME is designed to be used with a tactile screen, so that even children who cannot use the mouse due to a strong limitation in hands or arms functioning could use the platform. For instance, previous works (Gregor, Sloan, & Newell, 2005;Sanger & Henderson, 2007) have verified the relationship among button size and number of buttons in a touch screen and the effectiveness of the assistive communication device interface. We follow these recommendations, using the minimum number of buttons in the touch screen and defining the size of the buttons bigger than the size of the buttons of a common keyboard.…”