2018
DOI: 10.1002/pds.4588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing an algorithm for the identification and classification of pregnancy outcomes in German claims data

Abstract: Our algorithm led to plausible results regarding the identification and classification of pregnancy outcomes. It will be an important foundation for studies on drug utilization and drug safety during pregnancy based on GePaRD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pregnancy outcomes were determined adopting an algorithm specifically developed to identify pregnancy outcomes in German health insurance data. 6 Maternal and infant outcomes in pregnancy Information on maternal outcomes included live birth, stillbirth, elective termination, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, gestational week of delivery, delivery by CS, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes. A live birth was defined as preterm if it occurred before gestational week 37 and further defined as extremely preterm if it occurred before week 32.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnancy outcomes were determined adopting an algorithm specifically developed to identify pregnancy outcomes in German health insurance data. 6 Maternal and infant outcomes in pregnancy Information on maternal outcomes included live birth, stillbirth, elective termination, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, gestational week of delivery, delivery by CS, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes. A live birth was defined as preterm if it occurred before gestational week 37 and further defined as extremely preterm if it occurred before week 32.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of the beginning of pregnancy is the last step in establishing GePaRD as a data source for studies on the utilization and safety of drugs during pregnancy. We already developed procedures to reliably identify pregnancies and classify their outcomes ( 4 , 11 ) and to link mothers to the newborns ( 12 ). With this algorithm, we are now, for example, able to examine, in how many pregnancies the unborn child is exposed to a potentially teratogenic drug during the time window that is critical regarding exposure to the respective drug, to assess the outcome of these pregnancies, and to study the (long-term) effect of the exposure in the children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each entry contains two parts of information (i) the expected date of delivery and (ii) the quarter and year in which the EDD was coded. The database also contains the actual date of birth and specific codes with which to identify preterm births and births occurring after the due date ( 4 ). Prenatal examinations, which are typically conducted by gynecologists in Germany, may be identified based on the respective codes of the Doctors' Fee Scale within the Statutory Health Insurance Scheme (Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab, EBM), and the exact dates of examinations are available as well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 While we used a similar approach to Hornbrook et al 2 to identify pregnancy outcomes and to estimate LMP when Z3A codes were absent, we did not replicate the Hornbrook algorithms exactly as we did not have the additional data sources available including gestational age from hospital discharge summaries and an EMR-based preterm birth prevention database. Like Wentzell et al 18 that ranked outcomes as more reliable if the outcome date was from an inpatient stay, we ranked outcomes as more reliable if both a procedure code and diagnosis code were observed on the same date.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%