2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-022-03650-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized task scheduling in cloud computing using improved multi-verse optimizer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mohammed Otair [19] have introduced an Improved Multi-Objective Multi-Verse Optimizer (IMOMVO) to solve the task scheduling problems which occur in a cloud environment. The suggested approach rectifies the issues related to average positioning by improving the position based on the best solution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mohammed Otair [19] have introduced an Improved Multi-Objective Multi-Verse Optimizer (IMOMVO) to solve the task scheduling problems which occur in a cloud environment. The suggested approach rectifies the issues related to average positioning by improving the position based on the best solution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where 𝜀 is the quality of the food source and random number in the range 0 to 1 is denoted as 𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑 and predator effect is 𝑃𝐸 that is represented in Eq. (19).…”
Section: Exploitation Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Technique Used Addressed Parameters [7] APSO Makespan, throughput [8] LJ-PSO, M-PSO makespan, total execution time, degree of imbalance [9] GAGELS makespan, resource utilization [10] MPSO Makespan, resource utilization [11] IT2FCM Data movements, data placement, makespan [12] PSO-RDAL Response time, task deadline, penalty cost [13] EPSOCHO Makespan, processing cost, resource utilization [14] GSOS Makespan, cost [15] AINN-BPSO makespan, cost, degree of imbalance [16] QPSO Scheduling efficiency [17] MVO-GA Task transfer time [18] NSGAIII runtime, cost, power consumption [19] Hybrid Lion-GA Load balancing [20] GSAGA Makespan [21] GBO Makespan, accuracy of scheduling [22] HWOA-MBA Makespan, cost [23] IWHOLF-TSC Makespan, cost [24] HWACOA Makespan, cost ELHHO Schedule length, execution cost, resource utilization [28] RATSA Failure rate [29] SOATS Cost, energy consumption [30] HunterPlus Energy consumption, job completion rate [31] IQSSA QOS parameters [32] RAO Makespan [33] HFSGA Makespan, cost [34] DRL Makespan, throughput [35] IMOMVO Execution time, throughput [36] HBSFD Task processing time, turnaround time [37] Wale Disk space [38] Docker Containers Disk space…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simulation conducted on Cloudsim with random workload and results proved that penalty related to SLA violation minimized with ABFSOS. Authors in 9 formulated a task scheduling mechanism which uses improved version of MVO approach by adjusting average position of solution in scheduling. These simulations are conducted on Cloudsim and evaluated parameters i.e.…”
Section: Existing Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%