2019
DOI: 10.3390/a12020033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized Sonar Broadband Focused Beamforming Algorithm

Abstract: Biases of initial direction estimation and focusing frequency selection affect the final focusing effect and may even cause algorithm failure in determining the focusing matrix in the coherent signal–subspace method. An optimized sonar broadband focused beamforming algorithm is proposed to address these defects. Initially, the robust Capon beamforming algorithm was used to correct the focusing matrix, and the broadband signals were then focused on the optimal focusing frequency by the corrected focusing matrix… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the uncertainty of the sound field environment significantly affects positioning performance (Bucker, 1976; Tran and Trinh, 2017; Worthmann et al , 2017; Byun et al , 2020). Finally, BF applied in the field of underwater passive localization usually assumes that the received signal is a spherical wave, which has high localization accuracy for near-field hydroacoustic targets (Somasundaram and Parsons, 2011; Somasundaram, 2012; Bi et al , 2017; Yuan et al , 2020). However, with an increase in the distances between the targets, the received signal model approaches the plane wave from the spherical wave, which significantly reduces the performance of the target distance estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the uncertainty of the sound field environment significantly affects positioning performance (Bucker, 1976; Tran and Trinh, 2017; Worthmann et al , 2017; Byun et al , 2020). Finally, BF applied in the field of underwater passive localization usually assumes that the received signal is a spherical wave, which has high localization accuracy for near-field hydroacoustic targets (Somasundaram and Parsons, 2011; Somasundaram, 2012; Bi et al , 2017; Yuan et al , 2020). However, with an increase in the distances between the targets, the received signal model approaches the plane wave from the spherical wave, which significantly reduces the performance of the target distance estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%