2013
DOI: 10.2514/1.c031529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized Profile Descent Arrivals at Los Angeles International Airport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when it comes to asserting an average FF at a specific altitude or aircraft mass, long ULFs might lead to inaccurate results since the variation of aircraft mass from the start and end of the ULF is too great to link an average aircraft mass with an average FF. In the relevant literature, there are studies in which reduction of aircraft weight, along with fuel consumption, has been taken into consideration [4][5][6], while in others these effects have been neglected [3]. However, in this study, this is considered and therefore, in certain analyses, a different approach is taken.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when it comes to asserting an average FF at a specific altitude or aircraft mass, long ULFs might lead to inaccurate results since the variation of aircraft mass from the start and end of the ULF is too great to link an average aircraft mass with an average FF. In the relevant literature, there are studies in which reduction of aircraft weight, along with fuel consumption, has been taken into consideration [4][5][6], while in others these effects have been neglected [3]. However, in this study, this is considered and therefore, in certain analyses, a different approach is taken.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this effect may be different for different aircraft types, in some studies lightening of the aircraft weight, along with fuel consumption, is not taken into consideration [3], while in others it is [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of studies have been conducted to estimate the benefits and the feasibility of CDOs [1][2][3][4] or to determine the environmental benefits of continuous descent operations in a specific airport [5] or the national airspace system (NAS) [6].…”
Section: Figure 1 Schematic Comparison Of a Cdo And A Conventional Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDA flight trials at two airports, Louisville International airport (SDF) in 2002 and Los Angeles International airport (LAX) in 2007 have proved these economical benefits as well as noise reduction effect of CDA. 2,3 In spite of these significant benefits, OPD operations are restricted in low traffic conditions, especially at night. The reason of limited usage of OPD is a difficulty of prediction of descent trajectory and ATC make unnecessary large separation between aircraft due to this problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%