2023
DOI: 10.1111/jipb.13428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized prime editing efficiently generates heritable mutations in maize

Abstract: Low efficiency is the main obstacle to using prime editing in maize (Zea mays). Recently, prime-editing efficiency was greatly improved in mammalian cells and rice (Oryza sativa) plants by engineering primeediting guide RNAs (pegRNAs), optimizing the prime editor (PE) protein, and manipulating cellular determinants of prime editing. In this study, we tested PEs optimized via these three strategies in maize. We demonstrated that the ePE5max system, composed of PEmax, epegRNAs (pegRNA-evopreQ. 1), nicking single… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2023, Qiao et al added a structured RNA motif, evopreQ1, to the 3′ end of pegRNAs to improve their stability by preventing degradation and named the motif epegRNAs. They also optimized the PE2 protein to obtain PEmax and over-expressed the MLH1 protein with a disrupted active structural domain (MLH1dn) to inhibit the DNA mismatch repair pathway, thereby substantially improving the efficiency of PE editing in the maize genome [ 109 ].…”
Section: Strategies and Methods For Optimizing Crispr/cas9 Gene-editi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2023, Qiao et al added a structured RNA motif, evopreQ1, to the 3′ end of pegRNAs to improve their stability by preventing degradation and named the motif epegRNAs. They also optimized the PE2 protein to obtain PEmax and over-expressed the MLH1 protein with a disrupted active structural domain (MLH1dn) to inhibit the DNA mismatch repair pathway, thereby substantially improving the efficiency of PE editing in the maize genome [ 109 ].…”
Section: Strategies and Methods For Optimizing Crispr/cas9 Gene-editi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prime editing (PE) is one of the CRISPR-Cas-based gene editing approaches that allow in vivo installation of multiple types of precise DNA changes with low off-targeting activities [2][3][4] . The PE technique has been successfully applied and improved in monocots [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . However, the PE performance in dicots was extremely low and practically unsuccessful in the whole plant level [14][15][16][17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies derived from animal and plant research have been proposed to address the inefficiency and inconsistency of PE. Notable methods include the PE2max configuration, ‘flip and extension’ pegRNA protection, RNase H-truncated RT variant, nucleocapsid RNA chaperone use, Primer Binding Site (PBS) design within an optimal Tm range, and composite promoter use for driving pegRNA transcription 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 18 . Despite these advancements, the application of PE in dicots, specifically tomatoes, has been challenging due to efficiency issues potentially caused by factors such as self-complementarity of the PBS and spacer sequence, RTT complexity, PE protein stability, unfavorable reaction conditions, and pegRNA stability 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy of MMR suppression has also been attempted in plant PE engineering. For instance, compared with ePE3max, ePE5max expressing a dominant-negative variant of rice MLH1 ( OsMLH1dn ) or maize MLH1dn ( ZmMLH1dn ) increased the proportion of homozygous mutations in stable transgenic lines [ 13 , 14 ]. However, ePE5max using OsMLH1dn exhibited comparable but not significantly enhanced efficiency compared with ePE3max in protoplasts, and the same finding was obtained for the overall mutation efficiency in transgenic rice [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%