2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11467-021-1108-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation based on Förster resonance in Rydberg atoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, NGQC is shown to be compatible with optimal control methods [34][35][36]. Assisted by optimal control methods, NGQC can be implemented with robustness against systematic errors [37][38][39][40][41]. The above results indicate that NGQC holds comprehensive resistance to systematic errors, random noise, and decoherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Recently, NGQC is shown to be compatible with optimal control methods [34][35][36]. Assisted by optimal control methods, NGQC can be implemented with robustness against systematic errors [37][38][39][40][41]. The above results indicate that NGQC holds comprehensive resistance to systematic errors, random noise, and decoherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A variety of error sources limit gate fidelities in experiments, including a finite Rydberg blockade strength, decay of the Rydberg state, scattering of an intermediate state in a two photon transition, laser phase noise, variations of the laser intensity with the position of the atom in the trap and Doppler shifts of the laser frequency due to thermal motion of the atoms [22,27,28]. To mitigate the effects of these errors, many different improvements of the original protocol [18] have been proposed based on adiabatic passage [29][30][31][32][33][34], dark state mechanisms [35], Rydberg Antiblockade [34,36,37], and many other approaches [19,[38][39][40][41]. It is increasingly recognized that all these approaches can benefit from quantum optimal control methods to improve both the speed and fidelities of the various quantum gates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these models [5][6][7], the interaction of different types of atoms with various light fields [8][9][10][11][12][13] has been extensively studied and many interesting quantum optical phenomena have been probed, such as vacuum Rabi splitting [14], squeezing phenomena of optical fields [15][16][17], single photon blockade [18], and so on. Furthermore, many schemes for quantum information and quantum computation using atom-cavity-coupled systems have been proposed, for examples, realizations of quantum gates [19,20], generations of entangled states [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], operations of a quantum phase gate [29], and so on [30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above schemes [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], one premise of realizing quantum information and quantum computation using atom-cavity-coupled systems is to trap atoms in a cavity. Therefore, the ability to nondestructively detect the presence of atoms in a cavity is very important for quantum information processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%