1998
DOI: 10.1007/s006010050075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized Lower Bound for Four-Body Hamiltonians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it gives us a hint for a universal potential fitting in a Coulomb model with gauge symmetry, in a form ± (1-1/m) we wanted and roughly in accordance with observation, see When t = 1, the Hamiltonian (14a) can directly be rewritten, if the small perturbation is neglected, as H XY = H X-+ H Y+ -e 2 /R 12 -(IE X + EA X )+ 0 -e 2 /R 12 (14e) the simple one-term generic Coulomb solution, nearly conforming to (9a) or (11). We first discuss some implications of (14e) and of intra atomic charge inversion in the Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Intra-atomic Charge Inversion In the Hamiltonian Leads To Sysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Nevertheless, it gives us a hint for a universal potential fitting in a Coulomb model with gauge symmetry, in a form ± (1-1/m) we wanted and roughly in accordance with observation, see When t = 1, the Hamiltonian (14a) can directly be rewritten, if the small perturbation is neglected, as H XY = H X-+ H Y+ -e 2 /R 12 -(IE X + EA X )+ 0 -e 2 /R 12 (14e) the simple one-term generic Coulomb solution, nearly conforming to (9a) or (11). We first discuss some implications of (14e) and of intra atomic charge inversion in the Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Intra-atomic Charge Inversion In the Hamiltonian Leads To Sysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, if one has some experimental clues about ǫ ij (by measuring 2-body masses or dissociation energies) or numerical estimates as well, it is always interesting to obtain some relations between the ǫ's and the ground-state energies of larger systems. As mentioned in the introduction, this have been achieved in [2] for N = 3 and in [4] for N = 4 when the interactions are of the form v ij (r) ∝ sign(β)r β . For β > 0, the semiclassical argument given at the end of section 2 shows that (13) is expected to be unbounded; then (4) gives no information.…”
Section: Arbitrary Two-body Interaction 41 Behavior At Large Distancesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As mentioned in the introduction, this have been achieved in [2] for N = 3 and in [4] for N = 4 when the interactions are of the form v ij (r) ∝ sign(β)r β . For β > 0, the semiclassical argument given at the end of section 2 shows that (13) is expected to be unbounded; then (4) gives no information. If we want to take the advantage of the simple form (13) (that is, to keep the choice (9) with (11) for the test functions), we have to work with finite range potentials.…”
Section: Arbitrary Two-body Interaction 41 Behavior At Large Distancesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations