2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9030404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized High Resolution 3D Dense-U-Net Network for Brain and Spine Segmentation

Abstract: The 3D image segmentation is the process of partitioning a digital 3D volumes into multiple segments. This paper presents a fully automatic method for high resolution 3D volumetric segmentation of medical image data using modern supervised deep learning approach. We introduce 3D Dense-U-Net neural network architecture implementing densely connected layers. It has been optimized for graphic process unit accelerated high resolution image processing on currently available hardware (Nvidia GTX 1080ti). The method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using only a small training dataset (160 LDCT scans), our method achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 86.6% and labeling accuracy of 97.5% for VB segmentation and labeling. In terms of the absolute metric, our method performed worse in VB segmentation than that used in a previous study [24][25][26] but yet surpassed previously reported results [13,27] in VB labeling. Nevertheless, since different datasets were used in assessment of different methods, direct comparison of different methods should be interpreted cautiously.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Using only a small training dataset (160 LDCT scans), our method achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 86.6% and labeling accuracy of 97.5% for VB segmentation and labeling. In terms of the absolute metric, our method performed worse in VB segmentation than that used in a previous study [24][25][26] but yet surpassed previously reported results [13,27] in VB labeling. Nevertheless, since different datasets were used in assessment of different methods, direct comparison of different methods should be interpreted cautiously.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Furthermore, integration of Attention Gates (AGs) [64] and Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) blocks [65,66] are shown to increase the performance of the U-Net model in performing segmentation [64,66] and could be considered as another component for optimisation in the U-Net structure as performed in this paper. In addition, optimisation of the components for 3D neural network models would be a logical and next step to further the work in this paper as it processes 3D input and extracts 3D features, which can be beneficial for performing volumetric medical image segmentation [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the most successful models are based on 3D neural networks, which include the fusion of 2D/3D models. There are many 3D networks such as, but not limited to, Hybrid Discriminative Network (HD-Net) [32], V-Net [33] and 3D Dense U-Net [34]. In this paper we are considering only 2D networks as the number of components to optimise over is significantly less than in the 3D case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of a deep learning or convolutional neural network model is the most important step in a medical image segmentation pipeline. There is a variety of model architectures and each has different strengths and weaknesses [7,8,10,11,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Model Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%