Optimized grouping to increase accuracy of prediction of breeding values based on group records in genomic selection breeding programs

Abstract

BackgroundPhenotypic records of group means or group sums are a good alternative to individual records for some difficult to measure, but economically important traits such as feed efficiency or egg production. Accuracy of predicted breeding values based on group records increases with increasing relationships between group members. The classical way to form groups with more closely-related animals is based on pedigree information. When genotyping information is available before phenotyping, its use to form groups may further increase the accuracy of prediction from group records. This study analyzed two grouping methods based on genomic information: (1) unsupervised clustering implemented in the STRUCTURE software and (2) supervised clustering that models genomic relationships.ResultsUsing genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) models, estimates of the genetic variance based on group records were consistent with those based on individual records. When genomic information was available to constitute the groups, genomic relationship coefficients between group members were higher than when random grouping of paternal half-sibs and of full-sibs was applied. Grouping methods that are based on genomic information resulted in higher accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) prediction compared to random grouping. The increase was ~ 1.5% for full-sibs and ~ 11.5% for paternal half-sibs. In addition, grouping methods that are based on genomic information led to lower coancestry coefficients between the top animals ranked by GEBV. Of the two proposed methods, supervised clustering was superior in terms of accuracy, computation requirements and applicability. By adding surplus genotyped offspring (more genotyped offspring than required to fill the groups), the advantage of supervised clustering increased by up to 4.5% compared to random grouping of full-sibs, and by 14.7% compared to random grouping of paternal half-sibs. This advantage also increased with increasing family sizes or decreasing genome sizes.ConclusionsThe use of genotyping information for grouping animals increases the accuracy of selection when phenotypic group records are used in genomic selection breeding programs.

Genomic Prediction for Whole Weight, Body Shape, Meat Yield, and Color Traits in the Portuguese Oyster Crassostrea angulata

“…Fourthly, individual grouping methods such as mean weight of family based on genomic information should be considered in Portuguese oysters to improve the accuracy for further studies. These individual grouping methods have been shown to increase the predictive accuracy and resulted in a higher genetic gain ( Chu et al, 2019 ).…”

Improving Breeding Value Reliability with Genomic Data in Breeding Groups of Charolais

“…The reliability of predicted EBVs and GEBVs is also affected by contemporary grouping [26]. Genetic linkage between contemporary groups can help increase EBV/GEBV reliability through shared information from multiple contemporary groups.…”

Closing the yield gap: improving production efficiency in smallholder farms of Nile tilapia through selective breeding

“…The r g between the same traits were not estimable as the bivariate model did not converge when the whole data set (N=2063) was used. Alternatively, a subset of data based on clustering fish using genomic relationships was used and analysed with GREML (Chu et al, 2019) Individuals that were poorly linked to others were removed because this could result in fewer fish with a better genetic connectedness and alleviate the model convergence problem. STRUCTURE software version 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al, 2000;Falush et al, 2003;Falush et al, 2007;Hubisz et al, 2009) was used to cluster fish in each hapa into 10 groups, creating a total of 40 groups with closer than average relationship.…”