2022
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.024613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized Generative Adversarial Networks for Adversarial Sample Generation

Abstract: Detecting the anomalous entity in real-time network traffic is a popular area of research in recent times. Very few researches have focused on creating malware that fools the intrusion detection system and this paper focuses on this topic. We are using Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks (DCGAN) to trick the malware classifier to believe it is a normal entity. In this work, a new dataset is created to fool the Artificial Intelligence (AI) based malware detectors, and it consists of different typ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Daniyal used DCGAN to deceive malicious software classifiers into believing they are normal entities. In this work, issues related to model collapse, instability, and vanishing gradients in the DCGAN were addressed by the proposed hybrid Aquila optimizer-Mine burst and harmony search (AO-MBHS) (Alghazzawi et al, 2022). However, there are many improved algorithms for the Aquila optimizer that require further research and optimization.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Daniyal used DCGAN to deceive malicious software classifiers into believing they are normal entities. In this work, issues related to model collapse, instability, and vanishing gradients in the DCGAN were addressed by the proposed hybrid Aquila optimizer-Mine burst and harmony search (AO-MBHS) (Alghazzawi et al, 2022). However, there are many improved algorithms for the Aquila optimizer that require further research and optimization.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%