2005
DOI: 10.1007/11539506_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized Fuzzy Classification Using Genetic Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our model beats methods of Ishibuchi [8] on Sonar (20.67% vs. [22] on Sonar (20.67% vs. 28.37% and 30.29%); Wang weight refinement [17] on Sonar (20.67% vs. 29%), Iris (3.3% vs. 7%) and Pima (24.6% vs. 31%); Verikas [16] [11] on Iris (3.3% vs. 2%). It is worth to consider that several methods like [11] and [24] use GA approach to improve performance of fuzzy rules system whereas here we only use traditional approach for fuzzy rule with some limitation on number of attributes and membership function to generate rule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, our model beats methods of Ishibuchi [8] on Sonar (20.67% vs. [22] on Sonar (20.67% vs. 28.37% and 30.29%); Wang weight refinement [17] on Sonar (20.67% vs. 29%), Iris (3.3% vs. 7%) and Pima (24.6% vs. 31%); Verikas [16] [11] on Iris (3.3% vs. 2%). It is worth to consider that several methods like [11] and [24] use GA approach to improve performance of fuzzy rules system whereas here we only use traditional approach for fuzzy rule with some limitation on number of attributes and membership function to generate rule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ishibuchi [10,11] improved performance of fuzzy classification system based on rules by applying Genetic Algorithm (GA) approach with single, two and three-objective. By the same approach, Kim [24] also proposed new fitness function for GA and several new XOR membership functions. On the other hand, Verikas [16] limited classifier structure by using SOM tree algorithm and then applied GA to specify input variables for each fuzzy rule.…”
Section: Step4 (Classification Based On Rule Set)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abonyi and Szeifert [9] achieved a classification success rate of 95.57% using the controlled fuzzy set method. A classification success rate of 96.66% was achieved in the study by Kim et al [10] using a fuzzy rule-based method. Sahan et al [11] achieved a success rate of 99.14% using a hybrid model based on fuzzy artificial immunity and K-nearest neighbor in their studies.…”
Section: Studies For the Diagnosis Of Bcmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The rules of this kind of system are frequently characterized as “IF…THEN” statement and each rule can be defined as a fuzzy conception. Fuzzy rules permit to successfully categorize data having non-axis-parallel decision limits, which is difficult for conventional attribute-based methods [41].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%