2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized explicit finite-difference schemes for spatial derivatives using maximum norm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous approaches have been developed to deal with the numerical dispersion in space. One common way to reduce space dispersion is to use high-order FD schemes (Dablain, 1986;Liu and Sen, 2009), optimized FD operators (Etgen, 2007;Zhou and Zhang, 2011;Zhang and Yao, 2013;Wang et al, 2014), or the flux-corrected transport technique (Yang et al, 2002). The nearly analytical discrete methods (Yang et al, 2006(Yang et al, , 2007Ma et al, 2011) and stereo-modeling method (Tong et al, 2013), which introduce gradients of wave displacement in propagation, are proposed as well to suppress the numerical dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous approaches have been developed to deal with the numerical dispersion in space. One common way to reduce space dispersion is to use high-order FD schemes (Dablain, 1986;Liu and Sen, 2009), optimized FD operators (Etgen, 2007;Zhou and Zhang, 2011;Zhang and Yao, 2013;Wang et al, 2014), or the flux-corrected transport technique (Yang et al, 2002). The nearly analytical discrete methods (Yang et al, 2006(Yang et al, , 2007Ma et al, 2011) and stereo-modeling method (Tong et al, 2013), which introduce gradients of wave displacement in propagation, are proposed as well to suppress the numerical dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, temperature T controls the perturbation range of the optimal solution. High temperature is more likely to make it achieve a wider range (Zhang and Yao, 2013). Because −dE/KT < 0, the range of function P (dE) is (0, 1).…”
Section: Calculate the Coefficients Of The Optimized Implicit Staggermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, under the given tolerance limit Tolerrance, there will be many different groups of solutions whereas other optimization methods have only one set of solution. Therefore, we can take a further step to choose a set of optimal solutions by balancing between the error and the accurate wave number coverage (Zhang and Yao, 2013). Based on the assumption of discretization, we use the optimized first-order operator to approach the real wave number, and get the coefficients array X = [a; c].…”
Section: Calculate the Coefficients Of The Optimized Implicit Staggermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the numerical solver using a uniform grid (e.g., the finite‐difference method and pseudo‐spectral method) has less memory demand and computational cost, since it does not need to store the coordinates of the grid system and the wavefield can be explicitly updated without solving the inverse of the matrix. Thus, the numerical solver in the time domain using a uniform grid is one of the most important methods, and it is popular in various practical applications due to its simplicity and good performance (Etgen and O'Brien, 2007; Liu Y and Sen, 2013; Zhang JH and Yao ZX, 2013; Tan SR and Huang LJ, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%