Abstract:Concurrent screening has been proven to provide a comprehensive approach for management of congenital deafness and prevention of ototoxicity. The SLC26A4 gene is associated with late-onset hearing loss and is of great clinical concern. For much earlier detection of newborns with deafnesscausing mutations in the SLC26A4 gene, the Beijing Municipal Government launched a chip for optimized genetic screening of 15 variants of 4 genes causing deafness based on a chip to screen for 9 variants of 4 genes, and 6 varia… Show more
“…In 2012, Beijing launched a demonstration project of concurrent newborn hearing and deafness genetic screening. The project screened for nine mutations in four common deafness-related genes, such as c.235delC (p.Leu79Cysfs*3), c.299_300delAT (p.His100Argfs*14), c.176_191del16 (p.Gly59Alafs*18), and c.35delG (p.Gly12Valfs*2) in the GJB2 gene (MIM: 121011); c.919-2A > G and c.2168A > G (p.His723Arg) in the SLC26A4 gene (MIM:605646); m.1555A > G and m.1494C > T in mtDNA12SrRNA (MIM: 561000); and c.538C > T (p.Arg180*) in the GJB3 gene (MIM: 603324) ( 71 ). Currently, commonly used techniques for deafness genetic screening include microarray, PCR-fluorescent probe, fluorescent PCR, fluorescent PCR melting curve, PCR and flow-through hybridization, amplification refractory mutation system, PCR melting curve, combined probe anchoring polymerization sequencing, flight mass spectrometry sequencing, screening for known deafness-causing variants based on next-generation sequencing technology, and so on.…”
Section: The Present Stage Of Newborn Hearing Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2022, a large cohort study of 3,555,336 newborns reported by Zhang et al ( 78 ) showed that GJB2 gene c.235delC was the most common variant in the Chinese newborn population, followed by SLC26A4 gene c.919-2A > G, differing from those in the Ashkenazi Jewish, European, and American populations. In 2023, the current authors’ research team ascertained the advantage of a screening chip including 15 variants of four genes and found that 71.43% of newborns with two variants of the SLC26A4 gene were screened for newly added mutations and 28.57% of newborns with two variants of the SLC26A4 gene passed the hearing screening, suggesting that a screening chip including 15 variants of four genes was superior at early detection of hearing loss, especially in early identification of newborns with deafness-causing mutations in the SLC26A4 gene ( 71 ). The genetic screening identified additional children who will possibly benefit from early intervention and informed at-risk newborns and their maternal relatives of increased susceptibility to ototoxicity ( 74 ).…”
Section: The Present Stage Of Newborn Hearing Screeningmentioning
Hearing loss is one of the most common sensory disorders in humans. The purpose of this review is to summarize the history and current status of newborn hearing screening in China and to investigate future developmental trends in newborn hearing screening with the intention of sharing experiences and providing a reference for other populations. In the 1980s, the research on hearing monitoring for high-risk infants led to the gradual development of newborn hearing screening in China. With the continuous improvement of screening technology, the newborn hearing screening program was gradually extended to the whole country and became a government-led multidisciplinary public health program. Genetic screening for deafness has been incorporated into newborn hearing screening in many regions of China to help screen for potential and late-onset deafness in newborns. In the future, it is necessary to further establish and improve whole life-cycle hearing screening and healthcare, conduct screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection, and create a full-coverage, whole life course hearing screening and intervention system. Screening for deafness in China has been marked by 40 years of achievements, which have been a source of pride for entrepreneurs and comfort for patients and their families. Managing hearing screening data information more efficiently and establishing a quality control index system throughout the whole screening process are of paramount importance. The genetic screening for concurrent newborn hearing and deafness has a great clinical importance for the management of congenital deafness and prevention of ototoxicity. A hearing screening and intervention system across the whole life course should be developed.
“…In 2012, Beijing launched a demonstration project of concurrent newborn hearing and deafness genetic screening. The project screened for nine mutations in four common deafness-related genes, such as c.235delC (p.Leu79Cysfs*3), c.299_300delAT (p.His100Argfs*14), c.176_191del16 (p.Gly59Alafs*18), and c.35delG (p.Gly12Valfs*2) in the GJB2 gene (MIM: 121011); c.919-2A > G and c.2168A > G (p.His723Arg) in the SLC26A4 gene (MIM:605646); m.1555A > G and m.1494C > T in mtDNA12SrRNA (MIM: 561000); and c.538C > T (p.Arg180*) in the GJB3 gene (MIM: 603324) ( 71 ). Currently, commonly used techniques for deafness genetic screening include microarray, PCR-fluorescent probe, fluorescent PCR, fluorescent PCR melting curve, PCR and flow-through hybridization, amplification refractory mutation system, PCR melting curve, combined probe anchoring polymerization sequencing, flight mass spectrometry sequencing, screening for known deafness-causing variants based on next-generation sequencing technology, and so on.…”
Section: The Present Stage Of Newborn Hearing Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2022, a large cohort study of 3,555,336 newborns reported by Zhang et al ( 78 ) showed that GJB2 gene c.235delC was the most common variant in the Chinese newborn population, followed by SLC26A4 gene c.919-2A > G, differing from those in the Ashkenazi Jewish, European, and American populations. In 2023, the current authors’ research team ascertained the advantage of a screening chip including 15 variants of four genes and found that 71.43% of newborns with two variants of the SLC26A4 gene were screened for newly added mutations and 28.57% of newborns with two variants of the SLC26A4 gene passed the hearing screening, suggesting that a screening chip including 15 variants of four genes was superior at early detection of hearing loss, especially in early identification of newborns with deafness-causing mutations in the SLC26A4 gene ( 71 ). The genetic screening identified additional children who will possibly benefit from early intervention and informed at-risk newborns and their maternal relatives of increased susceptibility to ototoxicity ( 74 ).…”
Section: The Present Stage Of Newborn Hearing Screeningmentioning
Hearing loss is one of the most common sensory disorders in humans. The purpose of this review is to summarize the history and current status of newborn hearing screening in China and to investigate future developmental trends in newborn hearing screening with the intention of sharing experiences and providing a reference for other populations. In the 1980s, the research on hearing monitoring for high-risk infants led to the gradual development of newborn hearing screening in China. With the continuous improvement of screening technology, the newborn hearing screening program was gradually extended to the whole country and became a government-led multidisciplinary public health program. Genetic screening for deafness has been incorporated into newborn hearing screening in many regions of China to help screen for potential and late-onset deafness in newborns. In the future, it is necessary to further establish and improve whole life-cycle hearing screening and healthcare, conduct screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection, and create a full-coverage, whole life course hearing screening and intervention system. Screening for deafness in China has been marked by 40 years of achievements, which have been a source of pride for entrepreneurs and comfort for patients and their families. Managing hearing screening data information more efficiently and establishing a quality control index system throughout the whole screening process are of paramount importance. The genetic screening for concurrent newborn hearing and deafness has a great clinical importance for the management of congenital deafness and prevention of ototoxicity. A hearing screening and intervention system across the whole life course should be developed.
Hearing loss is the most prevalent neurosensory disorder in humans, with significant implications for language, social and cognitive development if not diagnosed and treated early. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the rate of hearing screening pass and genetic screening failure [universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) pass/genetic failure] and to investigate the advantages of combining newborn hearing and genetic screening for newborn hearing impairment. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 2023 to identify studies reporting the combination of neonatal hearing screening with genetic screening. Duplicate literature, unpublished literature, studies with incomplete data, animal experiments, literature reviews and systematic studies were excluded. All the data were processed by STATA15.1 statistical software. A total of nine cross-sectional studies were included in this meta-analysis. The sample sizes ranged from 1,716 to 180,469, and there were a total of 377,688 participants. The pooled results revealed that the prevalence of passing the UNHS while failing genetic screening was 0.31% (95% CI, 0.22-0.41%). The prevalence of UNHS pass and gap junction protein beta 2 and solute carrier family 26 member 4 variant screen failure was 0.01% (95% CI, 0.00-0.02%) and 0.00% (95% CI, 0.00%), respectively, while the prevalence of mitochondrially encoded 12S RRNA variant screening failure and UNHS pass was 0.21% (95% CI, 0.18-0.26%). Combined screening has a significant advantage over pure hearing screening, especially in terms of identifying newborns with mitochondrial gene mutations that render them sensitive to certain medications. In clinical practice, decision-makers can consider practical circumstances and leverage the benefits of combined newborn hearing and genetic screening for early diagnosis, early counseling, and early intervention in patients with hearing loss.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.