2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimized combined electrical–chemical parthenogenetic activation for in vitro matured bovine oocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
20
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that combined activation significantly improved the development potential of parthenogenetic embryos than chemical activation or electrical activation only. It was consistent with the previous studies in cattle (Hosseini et al 2008), goat (Kumar et al 2014), and pig (Ock et al 2011). Comparing with Ion chemical treatment, combined treatment of electrical stimuli induced more Ca 2+ oscillations, and it could mimic intracellular events induced by sperm penetration more efficiently (Sun et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that combined activation significantly improved the development potential of parthenogenetic embryos than chemical activation or electrical activation only. It was consistent with the previous studies in cattle (Hosseini et al 2008), goat (Kumar et al 2014), and pig (Ock et al 2011). Comparing with Ion chemical treatment, combined treatment of electrical stimuli induced more Ca 2+ oscillations, and it could mimic intracellular events induced by sperm penetration more efficiently (Sun et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Combined activation which integrated a transient inactivation of MPF obtainable with a single Ca 2+ rise, and with a persistent inhibition of MPF, induced by addition of either protein synthesis inhibitors or nonspecific kinase inhibitors may further improve the developmental potential of the IVM oocytes. IVM oocytes with the electrical stimuli or combined activation stimuli resulted in high embryo development in several species (Zhu et al 2002;Hosseini et al 2008;Hai et al 2014). Despite extensive research in this area, none of the available studies have been done to systematically compare chemical, electrical, and combined activation protocols, and less attention has been paid to the sequential use of these Ca 2+ -immobilizing agents, which may benefit the activation outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The couplets were then electrofused [a sinusoidal electric current (7 V/ cm) for 10 s followed by two direct currents (1.75 kV/cm for 30 μsec and 1 s delay)] in 290 mOsm fusion buffer free of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ . The reconstructed oocytes were activated using ionomycin (5 μM, 5 min) followed by incubation with 2 mM 6-dimethyl aminopurine for 4 h [17]. Activated reconstructs were cultured in presence (SCNT-TSA) or absence (SCNT) of 50 nM TSA for 12 h and then cultured up to 8 days as described by Vajta et al [18].…”
Section: Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (Scnt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To rescue cases that encounter problems in oocyte activation immediately following sperm-oocyte fusion, certain artificial activation procedures have been recommended: mechanical activation by a modified ICSI technique [8,9], electrical activation [10,11], chemical compounds such as strontium chloride [12,13], ionomycin [14], and calcium ionophores [15], and sequential treatment with calcium ionophore and puromycin [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%