1971
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.1971.4308301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization Theory of Large Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
299
0
20

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
299
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…sx es − y e ≤ 0, e ∈ E, s ∈ S. (12) Next, we have the formula of the Lagrangian function (Lasdon, 1970) obtained for the ILP formulation of RSA-UAM-DPP-AvgSpec and assigned dual variables, Note that the first term of the formula corresponds to the objective function while the rest of terms determine the constraints of the dual problem to the LP problem described by the formulas (8)-(12).…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sx es − y e ≤ 0, e ∈ E, s ∈ S. (12) Next, we have the formula of the Lagrangian function (Lasdon, 1970) obtained for the ILP formulation of RSA-UAM-DPP-AvgSpec and assigned dual variables, Note that the first term of the formula corresponds to the objective function while the rest of terms determine the constraints of the dual problem to the LP problem described by the formulas (8)-(12).…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following outline of column generation is based on [8] and [9,Chapter 3.3], in addition to the textbook [4]. A more detailed account is found in Appendix 2 The problem (1) can be formulated in di erent ways.…”
Section: Column Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may not necessarily be the case that Benders' algorithm terminates when (26) presented in Section 2.3, is that the algorithm is guaranteed to converge nitely since there is only a nite number of extreme points to the feasible set of the dual of Benders subproblem [9].…”
Section: Benders' Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the primal-dual solution pair (f (π), u(π); π, λ(π)). It follows from the saddle point conditions (see for example [4]) that the primal point (f (π), u(π)) is an optimal solution of (9), and the dual point (π, λ(π)) is an optimal solution of (10), so λ(π)ĥ = πu(π). Since u(π) ∈ U(ĥ), by assumption we have that u(π) ∈ U(h) and hence λ(π)h ≤ πu(π) = λ(π)ĥ.…”
Section: Necessary and Sufficient Condition For Ordinary Dominationmentioning
confidence: 99%