Optimization Provenance of Whiplash Compensation for Flexible Space Robotics

Abstract

Automatic controls refer to the application of control theory to regulate systems or processes without human intervention, and the notion is often usefully applied to space applications. A key part of controlling flexible space robotics is the control-structures interaction of a light, flexible structure whose first resonant modes lie within the bandwidth of the controller. In this instance, the designed-control excites the problematic resonances of the highly flexible structure. This manuscript reveals a novel compensator capable of minimum-time performance of an in-plane maneuver with zero residual vibration (ZV) and zero residual vibration-derivative (ZVD) at the end of the maneuver. The novel compensator has a whiplash nature of first commanding maneuver states in the opposite direction of the desired end state. For a flexible spacecraft simulator (FSS) free-floating planar robotic arm, this paper will first derive the model of the flexible system in detail from first principles. Hamilton's principle is augmented with the adjoint equation to produce the Euler-Lagrange equation which is manipulated to prove equivalence with Newton's law. Extensive efforts are expended modeling the free-free vibration equations of the flexible system, and this extensive modeling yields an unexpected control profile-a whiplash compensator. Equations of motion are derived using both the Euler-Lagrange method and Newton's law as validation. Variables are then scaled for efficient computation. Next, general purposed pseudospectral optimization software is used to seek an optimal control, proceeding afterwards to validate optimality via six theoretical optimization necessary conditions: (1) Hamiltonian minimization condition; (2) adjoint equations; (3) terminal transversality condition; (4) Hamiltonian final value condition; (5) Hamiltonian evolution equation; and lastly (6) Bellman's principle. The results are novel and unique in that they initially command full control in the opposite direction from the desired end state, while no such results are seen using classical control methods including classical methods augmented with structural filters typically employed for controlling highly flexible multi-body systems. The manuscript also opens an interesting question of what to declare when the six optimality necessary conditions are not necessarily in agreement (we choose here not to declare finding the optimal control, instead calling it suboptimal).Aerospace 2019, 6, 93 2 of 18 highly flexible structure. In order to optimize the control of such challenging systems, a brief review of mechanics and ubiquitous control techniques is warranted.Mechanical motion of mass in six degrees of freedom is completely described by separate treatment of three degrees of freedom of translation plus three additional degrees of freedom of rotation as articulated in the year 1830 [1] and expanded and modernized over the following two centuries [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Translational degrees of freedom are governed by Newton's law, whil...

Development of Deterministic Artificial Intelligence for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUV)

“…Other approaches emphasizing the use of the dynamics include real-time optimal control as compared in [75] to several other approaches, including classical feedforward plus feedback, open-loop optimal control and also predictive control. Offline nonlinear optimization [78] also emphasizes use of the dynamics, but adjoins the dynamics and constraints with a cost function to numerically find trajectories and controls that minimize the combined adjoined cost function. This use of the dynamics is effective but relatively unwieldy compared to the analytic approach developed here.…”

“…References [67][68][69][70][71][72][73] utilize data-derived models in the various adaptive schemes, while [74] substantiates the first evolution from simple adaptive systems with the innovation of deterministic self-awareness applied to the forced van der Pol equation. References [75][76][77][78] illustrate the utilization of the system models towards optimization and prediction. Lastly, [79] is the first book devoted to the application of the methods developed here applied to space systems, while this manuscript applies the methods to underwater vehicles.…”

Kinematics: On Direction Cosine Matrices

“…Artificial intelligence and machine learning has evidenced the need for rapid calculations, so as motion mechanics incorporate adopt these new learning algorithms, the impact of this chapter become increasingly relevant in that options revealed in here illustrate simultaneous accuracy and favorable rapidity of calculation [62]. This chapter also complements other algorithmic advances [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] like system identification [55][56][57][58][59] including nonlinear adaptive forms and also control [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] for space guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) missions [35,36,[60][61][62][63][64][65] in a time when the United States is developing and relying upon more advanced Machine Learning and AI products than ever before.…”

Comparison and Interpretation Methods for Predictive Control of Mechanics

“…Other researchers [36] sought extensions into nonlinear systems with actuator failures, while Reference [37] tried to use neural networks to find the model and response in a predictive topology. Inspired by the adaptive lineages [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]38] and learning lineages [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], both Reference [39] and Reference [40] break with the usual design paradigm and, instead, begin with the solution of a nonlinear optimization problem as the first step of control design, and that an alternative paradigm is adopted in this study, which results in controllers' instances leading to a novel proposal: a two degree of freedom controller that results from the original optimization statement including predictive control and robust feedback control achieving non-trivial results in the face of noise modeling errors not expressly written in the original problem formulation. The achievement of good results despite a dramatic simplification of methods is original and refreshing.…”