1981
DOI: 10.1061/jeegav.0001236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization on Refuse Collection Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various types of vehicles are used for collecting SW and the type of vehicle depends on the width of the road and the type of collection bin (Chiplunkar et al, 1981). In Kitwe City, the collection of SW is performed without much regard given to the type of truck and the width of the roads.…”
Section: Status On Msw Segregation and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of vehicles are used for collecting SW and the type of vehicle depends on the width of the road and the type of collection bin (Chiplunkar et al, 1981). In Kitwe City, the collection of SW is performed without much regard given to the type of truck and the width of the roads.…”
Section: Status On Msw Segregation and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large body of literature on the optimal routing of solid waste collection vehicles. Most of this work is directed towards minimizing the total travel distance within the collection route, usually on the assumption that the shortest travel distance will result in the least amount of time on the route and the lowest overall cost (Beltrami & Bodin 1974, Liebman & Male 1975, Male & Liebman 1978, Chiplunkar et al 1981. Nguyen & Wilson (2007) used GPS data from City of Hamilton waste collection vehicles to demonstrate that using the shortest route does not necessarily save a considerable amount of time since drivers travel at higher speeds when travelling along a street where they have already collected the waste.…”
Section: The Use Of Optimal Routesmentioning
confidence: 99%