2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Water Distribution Systems Using Online Retrained Metamodels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basic water quality parameters that are used in optimisation models of drinking WDSs are chlorine [27,87,120,143] and chloramine [120], modelled as non-conservative applying first order decay kinetics, adjusted by a higher decay rate in parts of the system when needed [120]. In contrast, conservative water quality parameters are typically important for regional multiquality WDSs.…”
Section: Design For Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Basic water quality parameters that are used in optimisation models of drinking WDSs are chlorine [27,87,120,143] and chloramine [120], modelled as non-conservative applying first order decay kinetics, adjusted by a higher decay rate in parts of the system when needed [120]. In contrast, conservative water quality parameters are typically important for regional multiquality WDSs.…”
Section: Design For Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of optimisation models, single-objective as well as multi-objective exist which include water quality considerations. In the former, water quality related expenditures, such as the cost of disinfection [27,120], cost of water treatment [53] or cost of losses incurred by insufficient quality [129], are combined with the system design/capital (and operation) costs into one objective. Alternatively, water quality is included as a constraint to a single-objective model in a form of minimum (and maximum) disinfectant concentrations at the network nodes [87,143].…”
Section: Design For Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, many researchers have shifted the focus of WDS optimization from traditional and deterministic techniques, based on linear and nonlinear programming, to the implementation of methods that were generally based on heuristics derived from nature [18,23]. In recent years, Evolutionary Computation has proven to be a powerful tool to solve optimal pump-scheduling problems [11].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Perez-Sanchez and his colleagues, by using EPANET model of an irrigation system, showed that theoretically 188. 23 MWh/year energy-equivalent to 137.4 ton CO 2 /year-can be recovered from the Water 2017, 9, 640 2 of 18 system [6,7]. León-Celi, C et al also used EPANET toolkit and two optimization algorithms to find the optimum flowrate distribution in water systems with multiple pump stations and minimize energy usage and potential leakage [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was possibly outlined first by Nain and Deb (2005). A variety of enhancements to this general approach have been proposed, including different sampling strategies (Knowles, 2006), dynamic algorithm control (Gaspar- Cunha and Vieira, 2005), and online retraining (Bi and Dandy, 2013;Xu et al, 2014;Minsker, 2006, 2011).…”
Section: Current Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%