2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-016-1348-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of user behavior based handover using fuzzy Q-learning for LTE networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Online English learning also overemphasizes the subjectivity of tools but neglects the assistance of tools. In view of this situation and the essence of multiagent in English online learning, the main solution in the current industry is to make full use of the multiagent system to improve the dictionary system [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online English learning also overemphasizes the subjectivity of tools but neglects the assistance of tools. In view of this situation and the essence of multiagent in English online learning, the main solution in the current industry is to make full use of the multiagent system to improve the dictionary system [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the work, the throughput rate has been increased by maximizing the data rate in the macro cells. Further, in [26], a fuzzy Q-learning based handover optimization model has been derived. And, the optimizations were done with addressing two issues, ping pongs and failures of radio links.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it does not exploit contextual information, such as movement velocity and application requirements for enhancing HM, SSF can lead to unnecessary and frequent handovers, decreasing throughput, increasing packet loss and even causing network service disruption. In [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] handover decisions are made by using multicriteria and techniques such as Fuzzy Logic, Network Management Policies or Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) Algorithms. Nonetheless, these approaches neglect an information model that disregards criteria from one or more information domains, such as network characteristics and status, application requirements, end-user profile, end-user device features, or handover history, which are relevant for advancing HM.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These handover issues can decrease throughput, increase packet loss and even cause network service disruption [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. The multicriteria-based approaches in [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] use RSSI and context information as criteria for ranking the available networks; the top-ranked network is selected by the end-user device for performing the connection process. These approaches disregard one or more relevant criteria, such as wireless network characteristics (e.g., coverage area), user device features (e.g., battery consumption), application requirements (e.g., real-time response) or user peculiarities (e.g., mobility pattern), leading to the failure of handovers and wrong network selection, negatively impacting the network’s performance [ 12 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%