Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXV 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2533164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of unsupervised affinity propagation clustering method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This operation provides less biased estimates of R and A matrices, in contrast to those obtained in [42,63].…”
Section: Preference Parameter and Responsibility-availability Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This operation provides less biased estimates of R and A matrices, in contrast to those obtained in [42,63].…”
Section: Preference Parameter and Responsibility-availability Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partitioning unsupervised methods, as defined in Refs. 24 and 25, can meet this need because they do not require the number of classes, associated learning samples (labeled data), or any other prior knowledge. The number of classes is objectively estimated according to a given optimization criterion or several optimization criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint spatial-spectral information is effectively incorporated into the proximity graph matrix of which the block diagonal structure is amplified by the "conductivity method" to improve the clustering performance [40]. The optimization of affinity propagation method is introduced to take into account the presence of identical objects in the samples to be partitioned and adapts the preference parameter to each object for HSI clustering [41]. Inspired by the success of MF in hyperspectral unmixing, a robust manifold method consisting of two MF components (RMMF) for HSI clustering is proposed in [42] and the clustering indicators can be directly obtained via the second MF component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%