2011
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2011.2160537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Train Regulation and Energy Usage of Metro Lines Using an Adaptive-Optimal-Control Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scheepmaker [11] incorporated energy-efficient train operation into the railway timetable by distributing the time supplements into segments, and the robustness of the generated timetable was analyzed. Similar studies can be found in [12,13]. Su [14] proposed a cooperative train control model to efficiently use the regenerative energy by adjusting the departure time of the accelerating train.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Scheepmaker [11] incorporated energy-efficient train operation into the railway timetable by distributing the time supplements into segments, and the robustness of the generated timetable was analyzed. Similar studies can be found in [12,13]. Su [14] proposed a cooperative train control model to efficiently use the regenerative energy by adjusting the departure time of the accelerating train.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In addition to using the Pontryagin maximum principle, Howlett, Pudney, and Vu (2009) provided an analytical method for the problem with more than one steep slope, and a local optimisation principle was used to solve the energy-efficient driving strategy for each part of the route. Lin and Sheu (2011) proposed an adaptive optimal control algorithm to regulate the train operation with less energy consumption. The method can be used to optimise the train regulator by adjusting the running time and dwell time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control objective is to seek the control input of train motion dynamics (7) and (8) to be the optimal solution of the following objective: (9) subject to (10) (11) where , is the desired output of the th train, is the upper bound of the state, i.e., the maximum speed limit, of the th train, is the minimum safe headway of two adjacent trains, . In a word, the objective is to choose the control input to drive the position of the train to track its desired trajectory under constraints of overspeed protection for a train and safe headway between any two adjacent trains.…”
Section: B Control Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…And then closed-loop control methods can be applied to drive trains to track this specified speed profile. A variety of speed regulation algorithms have been developed, such as PID control [5], fuzzy logic control [6], [7], linear quadratic regulators (LQRs) [8], [9], nonlinear output regulator [10], reinforcement learning [11], and control [12]. Most of these approaches are based on the Newtonian mechanics model of the train, and thus their control performances depend on the accuracy of the train models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%