2017
DOI: 10.1177/1687814016687196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the target profile for asymmetrical rail grinding in sharp-radius curves for high-speed railways

Abstract: Asymmetrical rail grinding in sharp-radius curves could reduce the side wear of railheads and enhance curve capacity of rail vehicles. The wheel/rail contact performance and curve capacity could be further improved by the optimization of the asymmetrical rail grinding target profile. In order to modify the target profile smoothly, the nonuniform rational Bspline curve with adjustable weight factors is used to establish a parameterized model of railhead curves in the asymmetrical grinding region. The indices of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the NSGA-II genetic algorithm [13,32] and the AMGA algorithm [33] exhibit robust global exploration capabilities, allowing for simultaneous comparison of multiple individuals and demonstrating potential parallelism. Moreover, they possess strong scalability, facilitating easy improvements [34]. Therefore, the two major genetic algorithms for the multi-objective optimization of train dynamic performance are both reliable.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization 61 Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the NSGA-II genetic algorithm [13,32] and the AMGA algorithm [33] exhibit robust global exploration capabilities, allowing for simultaneous comparison of multiple individuals and demonstrating potential parallelism. Moreover, they possess strong scalability, facilitating easy improvements [34]. Therefore, the two major genetic algorithms for the multi-objective optimization of train dynamic performance are both reliable.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization 61 Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8. There are also known methods [1][2][3] of dynamic simulation of rolling stock with the analysis of wheel/rail stresses. The above-mentioned methods and approaches for rail head profile restoration by grinding are based on the repetition of an initial rail profile.…”
Section: Analysis Of Rail Grinding Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of studies on this aspect, taking the w/r contact performance 6,7 or rail's service life as the optimization objective, 8 using different optimization algorithms to obtain the optimal grinding profile based on w/r contact theory. For instance, in order to improve the w/r contact performance and the curve negotiation ability, Zeng et al 2,9 proposed a new optimization method based on the Kriging surrogate model and the genetic algorithm to optimize the target profiles of the asymmetrical rail grinding in sharp-radius curves and the rail grinding in straight line for high-speed railway. Xiao and Liu 10 regarded the railhead silhouettes in differential rail cants as the rail grinding target profiles and obtained an optimal rail grinding target profile, while the equivalent conicity, contact stress, and grinding amount were taken as the evaluation indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%