2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the geometry and the turbine induced damping for fixed detached and asymmetric OWC devices: A numerical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accentuated influence of the turbine damping on the device performance highlights the importance of the appropriate selection of the turbine damping when designing an OWC device, as shown previously by, e.g., [49,[74][75][76][77][78]. For the wave conditions and damping coefficient values tested, the largest damping coefficient (B * = 64.10) is the one showing, generally, the highest values of C WR .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accentuated influence of the turbine damping on the device performance highlights the importance of the appropriate selection of the turbine damping when designing an OWC device, as shown previously by, e.g., [49,[74][75][76][77][78]. For the wave conditions and damping coefficient values tested, the largest damping coefficient (B * = 64.10) is the one showing, generally, the highest values of C WR .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Indeed, following the best-fit equation, and considering the diameter of the OWC chamber (8 m, at prototype scale) as the width of the device, a C WR value of about 15.5% is to be expected. Notwithstanding, previous work has shown that maximum values that are remarkably higher can be attained, e.g., 80% [60] or 87% [76]. In principle, these figures would appear to indicate that there is plenty of margin to optimise the performance of the OWC chamber.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The first one is a floating closed box (referred to as "BOX" hereafter), and the second one is the model of a generic floating "OWC WEC." The geometry of the OWC WEC tested during this study corresponds closely to that of the fixed OWC WEC previously studied at LABIMA-WCF, both experimentally and numerically ( [11,19,21]).…”
Section: Floating Bodies Of the Tested Box And Owc Wec Scale Modelsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Based on similar studies on the OWEC (e.g., [33]) and the OWC (e.g., [34]) technologies, and considering the physical limitations of the wave basin, the 2D physical model of the hybrid module was conceived and built at a 1/50 geometrical scale. Mitigation of scale effects associated with an incomplete hydraulic similitude was also taken into account as well as the logistical challenges inherent to incorporating an OWC and an OWEC hybrid WEC in a geometrically limited and already defined breakwater structure.…”
Section: Equipment and Experimental Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%