2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2018.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the gas separation performance of polyurethane–zeolite 3A and ZSM-5 mixed matrix membranes using response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 lists the gas separation performance of some MMMs made by different fillers in addition to zeolites. In comparison, the gas separation performance of the MMMs prepared by Pebax‐1074 and SAPO‐23 in this work is superior to most reported values in literature 18,57–62 . Besides, it also demonstrates that the applied dopants SAPO‐23 is comparable to NaY for MMMs preparation 26 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Table 1 lists the gas separation performance of some MMMs made by different fillers in addition to zeolites. In comparison, the gas separation performance of the MMMs prepared by Pebax‐1074 and SAPO‐23 in this work is superior to most reported values in literature 18,57–62 . Besides, it also demonstrates that the applied dopants SAPO‐23 is comparable to NaY for MMMs preparation 26 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Attention should be paid to the rapid development of superoleophobic/superoleophilic, superhydrophilic/superhydrophobic surfaces [19][20][21][22][23] and membranes [24][25][26][27] as well as energy-efficient modular separation devices, which are used for separation of oil-water emulsions and gas-liquid mixtures. Additionally, the appliance of inertial gas-dynamic separation of gas-dispersion flows in the curvilinear convergent-divergent channels [28] to improve the reliability of compressor equipment is presented in [29].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the findings in the literature, operating temperature influences the CO 2 permeability of the membrane by affecting the mobility of the polymer chain and free volume [ 18 ] in the polymer, thus resulted in a change of CO 2 diffusivity [ 19 ]. In contrast, feed pressure may affect the gas solubility in the membrane, which affects the CO 2 permeability [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%