2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the different phases of the freeze-drying process of solid lipid nanoparticles using experimental designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the huge size difference between the freshly prepared nanosuspensions DA-co-GSE-SLNs or GSE-ads-DA-SLNs (lines 1 or 8 in Table 1) and the corresponding ones before freeze-drying cycle (lines 2 and 9 in Table 1), it may be due to physical instability of the corresponding nanoparticles during the two weeks of storage at 4 • C in the refrigerator. All these results are in agreement with that reported in the literature for other negatively charged SLNs [15,26,27]. An interesting outcome of the physicochemical characterization of the nanocarriers herein studied refers to the most negative surface potentials observed by us in the case of lyophilized DA-co-GSE-SLNs-and GSE-ads-DA-SLNs-sucrose suggesting an increased physical stability of these cryoprotected SLNs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the huge size difference between the freshly prepared nanosuspensions DA-co-GSE-SLNs or GSE-ads-DA-SLNs (lines 1 or 8 in Table 1) and the corresponding ones before freeze-drying cycle (lines 2 and 9 in Table 1), it may be due to physical instability of the corresponding nanoparticles during the two weeks of storage at 4 • C in the refrigerator. All these results are in agreement with that reported in the literature for other negatively charged SLNs [15,26,27]. An interesting outcome of the physicochemical characterization of the nanocarriers herein studied refers to the most negative surface potentials observed by us in the case of lyophilized DA-co-GSE-SLNs-and GSE-ads-DA-SLNs-sucrose suggesting an increased physical stability of these cryoprotected SLNs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The favorable effect of the porosity on the release kinetic may also explain the higher neurotransmitter release from DA-co-GSE-SLNs-Meβ-CD compared with that of DA-co-GSE-SLNs-sucrose for which neurotransmitter was detected on the nanocarrier surface (Figure 2a). The gradual release of DA observed after the initial burst effect may be due to the erosion of the lipid matrix of the SLNs [27]. The reduced DA amount released from GSE-ads-DA-SLNs-Me-β-CD and from GSE-ads-DA-SLNs-sucrose (Figure 2a) may be due to the shielding effect exerted by the surface adsorbed antioxidant agent GSE on the SLNs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During freezing, the formation of ice crystals can cause the nanoparticles or oils drops in emulsions to aggregate or agglomerate, which can lead to an increase in particle size. Upon thawing of the sample, the ice crystals melt and the resulting liquid can cause the nanoparticles/drops to re-disperse [ 80 , 81 ]. However, if aggregation or agglomeration during freezing is significant, the nanoparticles may not completely re-disperse, resulting in a permanent increase in particle size [ 49 ].…”
Section: Impact and Effects On Physical And Chemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na fase final, conhecida como a segunda etapa de secagem, a umidade restante na câmara é removida por meio da dessorção. Nessa etapa, as condições de vácuo são acentuadas, e a temperatura é aumentada em relação à primeira etapa de secagem (ELBRINK et al, 2023). Esta técnica é amplamente aplicada nas indústrias farmacêuticas e alimentícias (SUKEGAWA; KONO; NAKAGAWA, 2022).…”
Section: Propriedades Dos Scaffoldsunclassified
“…Figura 50 -Comparação da taxa média de porosidade dos scaffolds híbridos de quitosana/gelatina (CG2-1) e quitosana/gelatina/xerogel de tanino-glutaraldeído (CGT-1), com concentração de quitosana de 1,33% (m/v) Fonte: Autor É importante ressaltar que a porosidade do scaffold é influenciada por diversos fatores, tais como o método de preparo empregado para a síntese e a composição do scaffold (ZHU et al, 2021). Conforme mencionado anteriormente, na técnica de liofilização, primeiramente o material é congelado para a conversão do solvente (água) em cristais de gelo e, após a solidificação, o solvente é retirado do material por sublimação, resultando na formação dos poros onde os cristais de gelo antes se encontravam (ELBRINK et al, 2023;SERRANO-AROCA et al, 2022). Portanto é essencial considerar a razão entre soluto e solvente durante a síntese do material, pois ela impacta diretamente na porosidade, uma vez que uma maior proporção de soluto resultaria em menor disponibilidade de solvente para formação de cristais de gelo.…”
Section: Porosidadeunclassified