2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4992398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of the choice of unmanned aerial vehicles used to monitor the implementation of selected construction projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall conclusion is that the adopted AHP method is an option for choosing the optimal UAV, but not an option that is recommended. It seems more reasonable to take advantage of methods directly using the values of individual criteria for the comparison process, for example, the Bellinger methods, as presented in paper [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The overall conclusion is that the adopted AHP method is an option for choosing the optimal UAV, but not an option that is recommended. It seems more reasonable to take advantage of methods directly using the values of individual criteria for the comparison process, for example, the Bellinger methods, as presented in paper [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In attempting to choose the optimal UAV, the authors identified criteria which are essential in the process of monitoring the implementation of linear building objects (see also [3]). The first criterion is the speed of flight, which often translates into flight range.…”
Section: Possible Applications Of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles In Construmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations