2006
DOI: 10.1080/17415970600573494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of slender structures considering geometrical imperfections

Abstract: In this article, we present an optimization model which incorporates uncertainty induced by geometrical imperfections. Within the model, geometrical imperfections are represented by means of random fields. The induced uncertainties are then treated using the concept of a convex model. The resultant problem is then solved in a two-stage optimization procedure. An arched girder is used to demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed that the structure is placed correctly on the supports, i.e., geometric imperfections are zero at the location of the supports. These constraints can be incorporated in the description of the random field by means of a conditional random field [41,42]. The conditional distribution of a Gaussian random field given some known values in a set of points {x i ∈ Ω|i ∈ 1, .…”
Section: Geometric Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the structure is placed correctly on the supports, i.e., geometric imperfections are zero at the location of the supports. These constraints can be incorporated in the description of the random field by means of a conditional random field [41,42]. The conditional distribution of a Gaussian random field given some known values in a set of points {x i ∈ Ω|i ∈ 1, .…”
Section: Geometric Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…finite element model) as variables subjected to uncertainty. This approach has for example been successfully applied to model geometric imperfections in robust shape optimization problems (Baitsch and Hartmann, 2006) and robust truss topology optimization problems (Guest and Igusa, 2008). Such an approach can be denoted as a Lagrangian type method since the computational grid (i.e.…”
Section: Misplacement and Misalignment Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assumptions can be accounted for using a conditioned random field based on random field interpolation using linear regression (Ditlevsen, 1996). This approach has been applied by several authors to model random fields of geometrical imperfections (Baitsch and Hartmann, 2006;Kolanek and Jendo, 2008). In the Gaussian case, the method is equivalent to replacing the random field by a conditional random field with known values.…”
Section: Random Fields With Known Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term derives from the fuzzy sets theory (Zadeh, 1965). In civil engineering, FSs are applied in problems that require analysis in presence of uncertainty: some noteworthy applications concern the structural design (Biondini et al, 2004; Malekly et al, 2009), structural reliability (Dordoni et al, 2010), structural control (Kim et al, 2010), risk analysis (Sadeghi et al, 2010), and the treatment of uncertainties (Möller et al, 2003; Sgambi, 2004; Baitsch and Hartmann, 2006; Tagherouit et al, 2011; Wang and Li, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%