The van Deemter equation relating the H.E.T.P. of a gas chromatographic packed column to carrier-gas velocity predicts that H.E.T.P. will approach a constant for a given column with increasing velocity for samples of very high or very low partition coefficient. In practice, H.E.T.P. goes through a minimum with increasing gas velocity for all samples. Two terms in gas diffusivity, originally proposed by van Deemter and by Jones, are required in addition to the three accepted van Deemter terms to account empirically for the experimental data. This five-term equation is not rigorous, and the data suggest that further study would lead to an equation resembling the form of the Golay equation for H.E.T.P. Experimental data showing the effects of packing particle size and liquid loading are presented. HE THEORY of plate height in gas T chroniatography originally published by van Deemter et al. (IS) relates the height of an equivalent theoretival plate (H.E.T.P.) a t a point along the length of the column to the carrier-gas velocity a t that point. The van Deemter equation expressing this relationship can be written in the following Rimplified form: B H = A + -+ C u U Bohemen and Purnell (1) attempted to fit Equation 1 to their experimental data and obtained unexpected variations in all three ternis with packing particle size, including negative values of .I. Similar results were obtained in unpublished work a t this laboratory. Giddings et al. (3) integrated this and several other equations over the length of the column to correct for the effect of pressure drop on gas velocity, but failcd to obtain a definitive fit to their rxpcrirnental data. Jones (8) presented an equation of the form: (2)where the B term has the same significance as that term in thevan Deemter equation, and E is a coefficient re-B H = ; + E u flecting the effect of gas diffusion on mass transfer.Jones found that liquid diffusivity was not a dominant effect in his experiments and so omitted van Deemter's C term. He and van Deemter later presented consecutive papers (7, 18) a t a meeting in which an attempt was made to reconcile the differences between Equations l and 2 . Van Deemter presented an equation including a gas diffusion term differing from that of Jones, but concluded that this additional term was at least an order of magnitude less significant than his C term.In subsequent discussion, Jones suggested that, in fact, there should be two gas diffusion terms. His E term, added to those presented by van Deemter, produces the equation below in expanded form.where the first four terms are those proposed by van Deemter a t that meeting.The arguments supporting the D and E terms of Equation 3 are as follows:van Deemter's original three-term equation (the first three terms of Equation 3) predicts that H will approach the constant term A as a limit with increasing gas velocity when k is either zero or very large. In practice, H always goes through a minimum with increasing velocity, as shown in the data presented below. In Equation 3, this minimum is...