2020
DOI: 10.3844/sgamrsp.2020.160.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Beams and Steel Beams: A Comparative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that the materials used in Project 3 were more favorable compared with those in the other projects. Regarding the schedule, the average construction time was obtained from the existing literature [42], considering the time for the construction of a single residence and 100 residences simultaneously. These results are listed in Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was observed that the materials used in Project 3 were more favorable compared with those in the other projects. Regarding the schedule, the average construction time was obtained from the existing literature [42], considering the time for the construction of a single residence and 100 residences simultaneously. These results are listed in Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is understood that the structural materials should be selected based on tangible criteria, considering factors such as cost, availability of materials in the region, etc. [42]. However, the cultural issue is often a determining factor in this selection.…”
Section: Additional Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the formulations of reinforced concrete, steel, and wood, beams, the objective was to minimize the total cost of materials and labor, taking into account the constraints and limits imposed by the corresponding standards. The adopted formulations were developed by the authors or under their guidance (Medeiros & Kripka, 2013;Magnan, 2019;Ozimboski et al, 2020). These formulations were implemented in the Excel Solver, using the generalized reduced gradient (GRG) method, and considering the variables as continuous.…”
Section: Optimization Of Reinforced Concrete Steel and Wood Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A double symmetry welded I-profile cross-section was considered (steel ASTM A36). The variables of the cost minimization problem (equivalent to weight minimization) were profile height, flange width, and web and flange thicknesses (Ozimboski et al, 2020). The unit cost considered was 7.72 R$/Kg.…”
Section: Optimization Of Reinforced Concrete Steel and Wood Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation