2017
DOI: 10.17737/tre.2017.3.1.0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Raw Material Composition in an Agricultural Biogas Plant

Abstract: We analyzed the operation of a typical agricultural biogas plant in Hungary. Our aim was to optimize the composition of substrates for the biogas production and make a correct recommendation for completing feedstock recipes by considering the raw materials and technologies analyzed. The calculations were based on a very detailed database (including the daily operating data of 1673 days). Distribution of the biogas yields in summer and winter periods was normal based on the One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first route (acetate substrate) is operated by acetoclastic methanogens while the second route (using H 2 substrate) is by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis [89]. Factors affecting biogas production include pH, hydraulic retention time, substrate load, temperature, C/N ratio, acclimation period, and substrate composition [47,90]. For any given experimental setup controlling two or more such parameters is easy on a lab scale, while on a large scale controlling parameters, particularly the feed composition is difficult to maintain over a long period of time.…”
Section: Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first route (acetate substrate) is operated by acetoclastic methanogens while the second route (using H 2 substrate) is by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis [89]. Factors affecting biogas production include pH, hydraulic retention time, substrate load, temperature, C/N ratio, acclimation period, and substrate composition [47,90]. For any given experimental setup controlling two or more such parameters is easy on a lab scale, while on a large scale controlling parameters, particularly the feed composition is difficult to maintain over a long period of time.…”
Section: Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any given experimental setup controlling two or more such parameters is easy on a lab scale, while on a large scale controlling parameters, particularly the feed composition is difficult to maintain over a long period of time. Recently, an agricultural biogas plant was used to demonstrate that optimized feed composition based on a detailed database and the linear program model could be helpful in achieving consistency in running similar biogas plants [90]. However, it was emphasized that optimization of such feedstock is promising but limited by the high organic contents contributed by maize and grass silage that governs the majority of the biogas produced.…”
Section: Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the economical aspect of biogas production can be most easily improved by increasing the organic load [15] or by optimizing the recipe [16], the use of waste heat also significantly influences operational results.…”
Section: The Characteristic Technological Parameters Of Cogeneration mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To optimize the dry matter content of the substrate, a linear programming (LP) model was used, similarly to our previous study [16]. Additionally, LP has been used as a model by several authors in biogas plant testing [66,67].…”
Section: Substrate Dry Matter Content Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%