2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-019-00399-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of pyrolysis conditions for char production from rice husks and its characterization as a precursor for production of activated carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R 2 and adjusted R 2 values were in good agreement, with an approximately 95% confidence level, implying that the experimental and predicted efficiencies were not much different [46,48]. Additionally, the predicted R 2 values of 0.8293, 0.8237, 0.8999, and 0.9202 for PLA/clay composites loaded with NaOH-modified K85 rice husks, Mg(OH) 2modified K85 rice husks, NaOH-modified K98 rice husks, and Mg(OH) 2 -modified K98 rice husks, respectively, were in reasonable agreement with adjusted R 2 values (respective differences were less than 0.2) [31,46]. Furthermore, the coefficient of variation (C.V.), which must be lower than 10%, shows precision of the actual and predicted model [25,39].…”
Section: Analysis Of Variance For Model Statistical Significancesupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…R 2 and adjusted R 2 values were in good agreement, with an approximately 95% confidence level, implying that the experimental and predicted efficiencies were not much different [46,48]. Additionally, the predicted R 2 values of 0.8293, 0.8237, 0.8999, and 0.9202 for PLA/clay composites loaded with NaOH-modified K85 rice husks, Mg(OH) 2modified K85 rice husks, NaOH-modified K98 rice husks, and Mg(OH) 2 -modified K98 rice husks, respectively, were in reasonable agreement with adjusted R 2 values (respective differences were less than 0.2) [31,46]. Furthermore, the coefficient of variation (C.V.), which must be lower than 10%, shows precision of the actual and predicted model [25,39].…”
Section: Analysis Of Variance For Model Statistical Significancesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Studentized residuals were randomly scattered in a constant range across plot "0." These plots did not show any clear pattern, suggesting random distribution of the residuals and hence validating the initial assumption of constant variance [31,35]. Moreover, all residual data points fell between + 4.03715 and − 4.03715, proving the adequacy of the quadratic models, especially in relation to the high R 2 values obtained [46].…”
Section: Diagnostics and Adequacy Of Residual Plotsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Figure 7, the band at 3399.65 cm -1 indicates the presence of stretching and symmetric stretching vibration of O-H and N-H for alcohols, carboxylic acid, and amides, respectively [22] and points to dehydration of cellulose and lignin components. The bands at 2932.86 cm -1 belong to stretching of C-H bonds [23], 1649.19-1650.16 cm -1 (C = C stretching), [24], and 1037.74-1130.32 cm -1 (C-O-C asymmetry stretching). The peak at 678.00 cm -1 is assigned to the bending vibration of the C-H bond [25], while the further drop in the band to 406.03-417.60 cm -1 (C-I stretching) indicated the involvement of alkyl halides with C -I stretching vibration as observed by other workers [26].…”
Section: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that the calorific value of the sample is not linearly dependent on the moisture and ash contents, rather, it is directly related to their total carbon contents, i.e., the higher the carbon content of plant biomass the higher the heat energy to do useful work [19]. Some workers [23] reported a calorific value of 19.951 kJ/kg for a combination of 50% coconut shell (25%) corn cob (25%) sugarcane bagasse, compared to coconut shell charcoal's 21.693 kJ/kg. Other workers [24] reported ash and coconut moisture contents of 10.37% and 1.56%, respectively; while rice husks show ash and moisture contents of 15.63% and 7.38%, respectively.…”
Section: Relationship Between Calorific Value Moisture and Ash Contementioning
confidence: 99%