2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of public spaces through network potentials of communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models/tools are clustered around different perspectives. We found Androulaki et al's [32] classification to be very comprehensive. This classification was performed based on strategic planning and management perspectives, and has five types: (i) public/private partnership models, (ii) event-based models, (iii) self-governing special assessment district models, (iv) maintenance and technical assistance partnership models, and (v) grassroots partnership models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These models/tools are clustered around different perspectives. We found Androulaki et al's [32] classification to be very comprehensive. This classification was performed based on strategic planning and management perspectives, and has five types: (i) public/private partnership models, (ii) event-based models, (iii) self-governing special assessment district models, (iv) maintenance and technical assistance partnership models, and (v) grassroots partnership models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…“Interdepartmental coordination” is crucial for the urban space maintenance paradigm because the maintenance responsibility falls between several institutions under different managements (Karim and Magnusson, 2008; Tamin et al , 2011). Modern and smart ways to instigate urban maintainability include community involvement in neighborhood maintenance (Androulaki et al , 2020), municipal maintenance funded by residents and community-organized action with resources provided by the municipality (Lichtenbaum and Rosen, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the degree of functional complexity, the higher the frequency of public space use, independent of whether the node is located in the center of the network. which leads to the importance of the participation in the design and construction of internal public space from mobilizing community residents [49]. Some studies have pointed out that in linear shaped public space, the node with stronger functional diversity has more access frequency and staying time of users, and such nodes do not need to be located in the central position of the linear space form [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%