2011
DOI: 10.1021/cg1013768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Protein Crystallization: The OptiCryst Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, polymeric films containing ionizable groups, such as sulfonated polystyrene, have been tested as heterogeneous nucleation inducing surfaces for proteins, among other numerous materials and native and/or engineered surfaces [9]- [11]. Nucleation kinetics and thermodynamics studies indicated that significant conformational changes can occur as the protein interacts with these surfaces [10,12]. Recently, the use of nucleation agents to accelerate the crystallization of proteins was demonstrated [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, polymeric films containing ionizable groups, such as sulfonated polystyrene, have been tested as heterogeneous nucleation inducing surfaces for proteins, among other numerous materials and native and/or engineered surfaces [9]- [11]. Nucleation kinetics and thermodynamics studies indicated that significant conformational changes can occur as the protein interacts with these surfaces [10,12]. Recently, the use of nucleation agents to accelerate the crystallization of proteins was demonstrated [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we investigated crystallization of lysozyme (as a model protein) on three different metal surfaces to determine the optimal surfaces for the crystallization of proteins using the MA-MAEC technique and the iCrystal system (a mono-mode solid state microwave source with a variable power up to 100 W and a monomode microwave cavity with transverse electric mode, TE 10 ). The present study yielded the following advancements in protein crystallization: 1) the use of the MA-MAEC technique with the iCrystal system significantly reduces the amount of time required for growth of lysozyme crystals; 2) X-ray diffraction quality protein crystals can be grown by continuous microwave heating; 3) silver, iron and ITO nanoparticle surfaces can be used to control the growth, size and number of the crystals; and 4) ITO is the most efficient surface for the growth of lysozyme using iCrystal system and the MA-MAEC technique to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a limited number of methods have been proposed for determining crystal quality prior to diffraction, including analysis of the birefringent properties of protein crystals and low-intensity X-ray diffraction prior to synchrotron X-ray diffraction (Watanabe, 2005;Owen & Garman, 2005). The lack of a reliable bench-top method for rapidly predicting crystal quality adds considerable time and expense to structure-determination efforts, since poorly diffracting low-quality crystals are often only identified as such after crystal harvesting and diffraction analysis by synchrotronradiation X-ray diffraction (Lunde et al, 2005;Vernede et al, 2006;Groves et al, 2007;Garcia-Caballero et al, 2011). During crystal growth, multiple crystals can grow together in nonspecific orientations and can complicate diffraction analysis, often resulting in poor quality of the structural data (Dauter, 2003;Borshchevskiy et al, 2010;Boudjemline et al, 2008;Garcia-Caballero et al, 2011;Yeates & Fam, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a reliable bench-top method for rapidly predicting crystal quality adds considerable time and expense to structure-determination efforts, since poorly diffracting low-quality crystals are often only identified as such after crystal harvesting and diffraction analysis by synchrotronradiation X-ray diffraction (Lunde et al, 2005;Vernede et al, 2006;Groves et al, 2007;Garcia-Caballero et al, 2011). During crystal growth, multiple crystals can grow together in nonspecific orientations and can complicate diffraction analysis, often resulting in poor quality of the structural data (Dauter, 2003;Borshchevskiy et al, 2010;Boudjemline et al, 2008;Garcia-Caballero et al, 2011;Yeates & Fam, 1999). Crystalline samples with multiple domains are not always easily identifiable by bright-field imaging, especially for the specific case of twinning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as mass availability is no longer a limiting step within the crystallographic project [8,9]. Additionally, the use of synchrotron radiation facilities [10,11] has improved not only the time for data collection (exposing the crystals to less radiation damage), but has also reduced the crystal size (in the scale of microns) needed to obtain X-ray data for structural purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%