2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.09.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of process variables and mechanism of arsenic (V) adsorption onto cellulose nanocomposite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, the reagent had chosen should be cost effective and also should not damage the adsorbent bed, according to these perspective, some of the reagents have proved their worth in earlier adsorption studies [2,31]. Hence, in an alkaline medium As(V)/As(III) could be desorbed from the adsorbent surface as sodium arsenate (Na 2 AsO 4 − ) with 1.0 mol L -1 of NaOH in 5 mL.…”
Section: Adsorbent Regeneration Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ideally, the reagent had chosen should be cost effective and also should not damage the adsorbent bed, according to these perspective, some of the reagents have proved their worth in earlier adsorption studies [2,31]. Hence, in an alkaline medium As(V)/As(III) could be desorbed from the adsorbent surface as sodium arsenate (Na 2 AsO 4 − ) with 1.0 mol L -1 of NaOH in 5 mL.…”
Section: Adsorbent Regeneration Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eluted As(V)/As(III) solution were collected separately, the process were undertaken, so as to minimize the direct disposal of higher concentration, after elution the problem of disposal which is an important issues to be taken into the consideration. To avoid the direct disposal of higher concentration of As(V)/As(III) in the laboratory sink, the eluate were diluted and utilized for the subsequent experiments studies [27,30,31].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous materials have been used as adsorbents, such as activated carbon, fly ash, clays, muds, various oxides, polymeric resins, biomaterials, composites, etc. In the last three years, many novel adsorbents have been reported for efficient arsenic removal including zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) (Liua et al, 2018), graphene oxide@iron aluminium oxide composite (Majia et al, 2018), α-FeOOH decorated graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes aerogel (Fu et al, 2017), magnetite submicroparticles (Mejia-Sentillan et al, 2018), cerium loaded cellulose nanocomposite (Santra and Sarkar, 2016), iron oxyhydroxide on the root powder (Lin et al, 2018), etc. There is a pronounced tendency that adsorbents should be more economic.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. There are various methods for the adsorption or removal of arsenic from contaminated water sources, the most important of which are chemical deposition [2], reduction by electron ultrafiltration [3], ion exchange [4], and absorption process [5]. Among these approaches, the absorption method is more cost-effective, efficient, and easy-to-absorb, and extensive studies on the absorption of arsenic by adsorption processes have been reported .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%