2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Process Parameters in Abrasive Water Jet Machining/Cutting (AWJM) of Nickel Alloy using Traditional Analysis to Minimize Kerf Taper Angle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental data presented in Figure 5 demonstrates that the narrowing of top and bottom kerf widths depends directly on the decreasing amount of abrasive particles during the machining process. A similar explanation was study by Jeykrishnan et al [33], where a larger kerf top width than bottom width formed by AWJM in an Inconel 625 alloy. In this study, a lower rate of traverse speed at 90 mm/min amounted to lower variation in kerf widths as compared to a higher rate of 120-150mm/min.…”
Section: Kerf Top Width and Bottom Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The experimental data presented in Figure 5 demonstrates that the narrowing of top and bottom kerf widths depends directly on the decreasing amount of abrasive particles during the machining process. A similar explanation was study by Jeykrishnan et al [33], where a larger kerf top width than bottom width formed by AWJM in an Inconel 625 alloy. In this study, a lower rate of traverse speed at 90 mm/min amounted to lower variation in kerf widths as compared to a higher rate of 120-150mm/min.…”
Section: Kerf Top Width and Bottom Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The MRR and DOC increased with the increase in processing pressure. Jeykrishnan et al (2019) aimed to reduce the kerf angle by optimizing water pressure, stand-off distance and feed rate in AWJ machining of Inconel-625 super alloy. The results showed that the output characteristics of the water pressure played an important role in influencing the abrasive feed rate and the stand-off distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input parameters considered in abrasive waterjet contour cutting in this experiment included traverse rate (V f ), abrasive flow rate (m a ) and water pressure (P), as these parameters have been demonstrated in previous studies as having significant impacts in AWJM applications [10,12,23,24]. Surface integrity, kerf geometries and low material removal rate evidence has been reported in machining of AISI 304L, requiring further improvement [4,25].…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they established standoff distances, as the least contributing parameter. Research focused on optimisation of cutting operations is being continuously undertaken by researchers, where varied methods have been employed to solve different single and multi-objective optimisation problems [11][12][13][14]. Whereas single-objective optimisation problems have conventionally been applied, the performance of AWJM has mainly been measured based on multiple responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%