2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2015.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of process parameters for machining of AISI-1045 steel using Taguchi design and ANOVA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the change points discovered using the Pettitt test, we divided the time series into three sub-periods: [1961][1962][1963][1964][1965][1966][1967][1968][1969][1970][1971][1972][1973][1974][1975][1976][1977][1978][1979][1980][1981][1982][1983][1984][1985][1986][1987][1988][1989][1990][1991][1992][1993][1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999] After the normal distribution test and homogeneity test of variance using Shapiro-Wilk [49] and Bartlett test [50], respectively, analysis of variance (ANOVA) [51][52][53] was performed to investigate the variations of the water level. Table 4 shows that no significant differences in mean water level are not significant, but the approximate probability for the change points for WLm in 1999 is significant.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Water Levels Between Three Time Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the change points discovered using the Pettitt test, we divided the time series into three sub-periods: [1961][1962][1963][1964][1965][1966][1967][1968][1969][1970][1971][1972][1973][1974][1975][1976][1977][1978][1979][1980][1981][1982][1983][1984][1985][1986][1987][1988][1989][1990][1991][1992][1993][1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999] After the normal distribution test and homogeneity test of variance using Shapiro-Wilk [49] and Bartlett test [50], respectively, analysis of variance (ANOVA) [51][52][53] was performed to investigate the variations of the water level. Table 4 shows that no significant differences in mean water level are not significant, but the approximate probability for the change points for WLm in 1999 is significant.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Water Levels Between Three Time Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the change points discovered using the Pettitt test, we divided the time series into three sub-periods: 1961-1980, 1981-1999, and 2000-2012. Considering the operation of Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR), the time series are divided the time series into three different sub-periods: 1961-1980, 1981-2002, and 2003-2014. After the normal distribution test and homogeneity test of variance using Shapiro-Wilk [49] and Bartlett test [50], respectively, analysis of variance (ANOVA) [51][52][53] was performed to investigate the variations of the water level. Table 4 shows that no significant differences in mean water level among three sub-periods divided by the change points discovered using the Pettitt test and the operation of TGR, but there were some differences in mean water level among different months.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Water Levels Between Three Time Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depth of cut (a = 0.5 mm) and feed rate (f = 0.1 mm/r) were kept constant. The cutting conditions used in the experiments were selected according to the review of the scientific literature [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. These are described in Table 3.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Factorial Design Of The Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hernández et al [23] analyzed the resultant cutting force evolution in high speed turning of AISI 1045 steel with two coated carbide and a cermet inserts, but the authors did not include the tool flank wear. Qasim et al [24] presented an optimization of process parameters for high-speed machining of AISI 1045 steel, using several cutting tools, with the objective of reducing cutting forces and temperature. The principal investigations in high-speed turning of plain carbon steel are presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S/N ratio is used to detect control factors that reduce variability in a process by minimizing the effects of uncontrollable factors. TM has been widely used in different fields, as represented in the following recently published studies: Gunay and Yucel (2013); Rajasekaran et al (2013), Sutcu (2013), Dasgupta et al (2014), Gu et al (2014), Qasim et al (2015), and Esen and Turgut (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%