2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.138-139.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Plate with Partial Constrained Layer Damping Treatment for Vibration and Noise Reduction

Abstract: To efficiently reduce vibration and noise of a plate, an optimization of passive constrained layer damping (CLD) is presented. The dynamic equation of a sandwich plate with CLD treatment is derived using Lagrange’s method. The assumed modes method is employed to solve the equation and obtain the vibrational energy and sound power, which are used as the objective of optimal design. A genetic algorithm of big mutation is employed to search for the optimum of the location of CLD treatment, the thicknesses of both… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 to 12 indicate the added mass of the CLD configuration as proposed in the original study where those authors considered the thickness of the viscoelastic layer as an optimisation parameter. In these cases there are CLD configurations identified here which were more efficient than those originally identified by the authors, for example the CLD configuration as proposed by Hou [20] was more efficient with a thinner viscoelastic layer, see Fig. 12.…”
Section: Loss Efficiency Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9 to 12 indicate the added mass of the CLD configuration as proposed in the original study where those authors considered the thickness of the viscoelastic layer as an optimisation parameter. In these cases there are CLD configurations identified here which were more efficient than those originally identified by the authors, for example the CLD configuration as proposed by Hou [20] was more efficient with a thinner viscoelastic layer, see Fig. 12.…”
Section: Loss Efficiency Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Relative amplitude reduction to the undamped structure (%) Loss efficiency E Loss efficiency E Hajela [11] Hau [29] Marcelin [12] Figure 5b Loss efficiency E Loss efficiency E Loss efficiency E Simply supported plate DSLJ [5] Chen [15] Hou [20] Ling [21] Zheng [22] Figure 12…”
Section: Cantilever Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, looking into the field of optimisation studies for damping of honeycomb structures, both symmetric and asymmetric solutions are found depending on the respective critical parameters. Asymmetric results are produced by Zheng et al 32 and Hou et al 33 for simply supported honeycomb structures. Both were using vibrational energy as a performance parameter which is related to the displacement response used in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%