2014
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2013.2289963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Plasmonic Nanodipole Antenna Arrays for Sensing Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some broad categories of applications include solar energy harvesting, biosensing, and photocatalysis. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In recent years the spontaneous deformation of a thin film leading to nanoscale patterns governed by self-organizing principles have generated great interest. The reason is that by controlling the choice of materials, such as film and substrate, intrinsic forces of surface tension and dispersion can be changed to modify the time and length scales of pattern formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some broad categories of applications include solar energy harvesting, biosensing, and photocatalysis. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In recent years the spontaneous deformation of a thin film leading to nanoscale patterns governed by self-organizing principles have generated great interest. The reason is that by controlling the choice of materials, such as film and substrate, intrinsic forces of surface tension and dispersion can be changed to modify the time and length scales of pattern formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a nanoantenna operating as a transmitter makes it possible to detect nearby particles (e.g., located in its terminal) from far zone, which can be useful in a plethora of applications, such as bio-sensing. Although most (particularly earlier) studies on nanoantennas have investigated relatively simple geometries, such as bowtie, 1,2,8,10 monopole/dipole, 4,6,12,23,28 disk (or its inversion, i.e., hole), 7,38 sphere, 16 as well as their arrays (e.g., Yagi-Uda structures), 11,13,15,22,24,25,36,37 mainly considering restrictions in experimental setups, relatively complex shapes (e.g., fractal, 3 cross-shaped, 21 flower-shaped, 26 spiral, 27 horn-shaped, 31 tapered, 33 log-periodic, 34,35 and combinations with other nanostructures 32 ) have also been studied. In fact, besides the basic material, 19,20 geometry is one of the most important factors for the performance of a nanoantenna, 29 and new advances in nanoscale fabrication techniques encourage researchers to resort alternative shapes, which can demonstrate desired capabilities (in terms of bandwidth, directivity, field enhancement, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1: Diagrams of various virus-sensing methodologies which depends on the plasmonic and metamaterial-based structures [13] A 4×4×4 mm3 millimetre scale antenna [14] that is more suited for WSN applications was proposed and evaluated for sensitivity and EIRP. It met Design and Analysis of Meta Resonator-based Tri-Band Antenna for Bio-sensing App the substrate's conformal requirements, but lagged in terms of SAR performance.The biosensing antenna array [15], which is made of a silicon substrate and glass coated water, runs at multiple wavelengths of 850 nm, 1310 nm, and 1550 nm, and performs well with the best possible bulk sensitivity, but the SAR parameters were not verified. With the aid of 3D printing technology, an RFID antenna [16] [17] created for biosensing applications was constructed with polypropylene (PP) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%