“…Similarly, a nanoantenna operating as a transmitter makes it possible to detect nearby particles (e.g., located in its terminal) from far zone, which can be useful in a plethora of applications, such as bio-sensing. Although most (particularly earlier) studies on nanoantennas have investigated relatively simple geometries, such as bowtie, 1,2,8,10 monopole/dipole, 4,6,12,23,28 disk (or its inversion, i.e., hole), 7,38 sphere, 16 as well as their arrays (e.g., Yagi-Uda structures), 11,13,15,22,24,25,36,37 mainly considering restrictions in experimental setups, relatively complex shapes (e.g., fractal, 3 cross-shaped, 21 flower-shaped, 26 spiral, 27 horn-shaped, 31 tapered, 33 log-periodic, 34,35 and combinations with other nanostructures 32 ) have also been studied. In fact, besides the basic material, 19,20 geometry is one of the most important factors for the performance of a nanoantenna, 29 and new advances in nanoscale fabrication techniques encourage researchers to resort alternative shapes, which can demonstrate desired capabilities (in terms of bandwidth, directivity, field enhancement, etc.)…”