2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2013.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of pacing intervals in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Abstract: U osob s chronickým srdečním selháním při významné systolické dysfunkci levé komory a prodlouženém komplexu QRS slouží srdeční resynchronizační léčba (SRL) k nápravě synchronicity depolarizace myokardu. Míra zlepšení klinického stavu a echokardiografi ckého nálezu po jejím zavedení však závisí na různých parametrech -strukturálních změnách myokardu, poruchách nitrokomorového vedení a umístění stimulačních elektrod. K individualizaci léčby lze na implantovaných SRL přístrojích nastavit různé parametry, z nichž … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Echocardiography presents inherent variability of results and is highly operator dependent (Gras et al, 2009). Optimization based on intracardiac electrogram intervals has not proved yet to be of clear benefit above arbitrary AV interval (Ulč and Vančura, 2013). Multisite pacing has shown favorable results, although it is technically complex (Cazeau et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Echocardiography presents inherent variability of results and is highly operator dependent (Gras et al, 2009). Optimization based on intracardiac electrogram intervals has not proved yet to be of clear benefit above arbitrary AV interval (Ulč and Vančura, 2013). Multisite pacing has shown favorable results, although it is technically complex (Cazeau et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Echocardiography presents inherent variability of results and is highly operator dependent. Optimization based on intracardiac electrogram intervals has not proved yet to be of clear benefit above arbitrary atrioventricular interval (Ulč and Vančura, 2013). Another optimization method based on the surface ECG uses fusion with intrinsic conduction and avoids echocardiographic atrioventricular and biventricular optimization (Arbelo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Echocardiography presents inherent variability of results and is highly operator dependent. Optimization based on intracardiac electrogram intervals has not proved yet to be of clear benefit above arbitrary atrioventricular interval [151]. Another optimization method based on the surface ECG uses fusion with intrinsic conduction and avoids echocardiographic atrioventricular and biventricular optimization [152].…”
Section: Chapter 3 3 Optimization Of Lead Placement In the Right Ventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Echocardiography presents inherent variability of results and is highly operator dependent [147]. Optimization based on intracardiac electrogram intervals has not proved yet to be of clear benefit above arbitrary AV interval [151]. Multisite pacing has shown favorable results, although it is technically complex [200].…”
Section: Optimal Delay Between Pacing Leadsmentioning
confidence: 99%