2022
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of Object Injection Current in the Development of Electrical Impedance Tomography for Bone Fracture Detection

Abstract: Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) nearly has all the parameters of the ideal of a modality tomography. There is one parameter that makes the EIT modality not yet ideal. It is the low spatial resolution of the image. Unfortunately, it is limited in the range of 5 percent to 10 percent of the object diameter. The causal factor is the limited number of measurement data obtained. The focus of research on EIT at now is the development of functional applications. The novel application developed in this research … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When reconstructing 3D-printed normal or fractured bone phantom using water reference data, both exhibit the same conductivity range, indicated by blue Figures 9(a Based on the results of the image reconstruction carried out, it can be seen that the EIT built in this study was capable of detecting differences between 3D printing of normal bone and fractures using a frequency of 10 kHz. This result was from the previous study, which also used a frequency of 10 kHz [27]. Apart from that, when the 3D printing of normal bones was reconstructed with the 3D printing of fractured bones, it appeared that there was only part of the fracture.…”
Section: Image Reconstructionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…When reconstructing 3D-printed normal or fractured bone phantom using water reference data, both exhibit the same conductivity range, indicated by blue Figures 9(a Based on the results of the image reconstruction carried out, it can be seen that the EIT built in this study was capable of detecting differences between 3D printing of normal bone and fractures using a frequency of 10 kHz. This result was from the previous study, which also used a frequency of 10 kHz [27]. Apart from that, when the 3D printing of normal bones was reconstructed with the 3D printing of fractured bones, it appeared that there was only part of the fracture.…”
Section: Image Reconstructionsupporting
confidence: 66%