2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of muscle activation schemes in a finite element neck model simulating volunteer frontal impact scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the full neck level, the model was validated ( Barker and Cronin, 2021 ) in rear impacts using cadaveric full neck experimental data and in frontal and lateral impacts using human volunteer data. The active muscle activation scheme of the M50 26YO and F05 26YO was developed previously using volunteer data ( Correia et al, 2020 ). The open-loop co-contraction muscle activation scheme ( Correia et al, 2020 ) was designed to contract the neck muscles while maintaining the head in a neutral posture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the full neck level, the model was validated ( Barker and Cronin, 2021 ) in rear impacts using cadaveric full neck experimental data and in frontal and lateral impacts using human volunteer data. The active muscle activation scheme of the M50 26YO and F05 26YO was developed previously using volunteer data ( Correia et al, 2020 ). The open-loop co-contraction muscle activation scheme ( Correia et al, 2020 ) was designed to contract the neck muscles while maintaining the head in a neutral posture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active muscle activation scheme of the M50 26YO and F05 26YO was developed previously using volunteer data ( Correia et al, 2020 ). The open-loop co-contraction muscle activation scheme ( Correia et al, 2020 ) was designed to contract the neck muscles while maintaining the head in a neutral posture. The GHBMC neck model was objectively compared to the experimental data using the cross-correlation and corridor method ( Correia et al, 2020 ; Barker and Cronin, 2021 ) with good cross-correlation ratings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are primarily categorized into finite element (FE) models and multibody dynamics (MB) models. Taking the FE models as examples, the SAFER A-HBM developed in the previous studies modeled the human's reflexes mechanism for controlling cervical spine muscle activation [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The THUMS Version 5 included Proportion-Integral-Derivative (PID) based active muscle controllers for all body regions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropometric test devices (ATDs), commonly used in occupant safety testing, have the inherent drawback of a passive-only response and are designed for medium- to high-severity impacts. Unlike physical testing with ATDs, human-body models for numerical simulations offer the possibility of incorporating an active response in a variety of dynamic conditions [ 1 , 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%