2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of multistage membrane distillation system for treating shale gas produced water

Abstract: Thermal membrane distillation (MD) is an emerging technology to desalinate highsalinity wastewaters, including shale gas produced water to reduce the corresponding water footprint of fracturing operations. In this work, we introduce a rigorous optimization model with energy recovery for the synthesis of multistage direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) system. The mathematical model (implemented in GAMS software) is formulated via generalized disjunctive programming (GDP) and mixed-integer nonlinear progr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in order to evaluate the whole sustainability of the process, it is also interesting to compare the results obtained in our environmental study with other factors, such as the cost of each technology. In this sense, a comparison between the total impact and the cost of all the technologies (based on the works by Carrero-Parreño et al [51] and Onishi et al [50]) is shown in Figure 5. The multiple-effect evaporation (MEE-MVR) system is around 35% less expensive than the SEE-MVR system, as was shown in the publication by Onishi et al [50].…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, in order to evaluate the whole sustainability of the process, it is also interesting to compare the results obtained in our environmental study with other factors, such as the cost of each technology. In this sense, a comparison between the total impact and the cost of all the technologies (based on the works by Carrero-Parreño et al [51] and Onishi et al [50]) is shown in Figure 5. The multiple-effect evaporation (MEE-MVR) system is around 35% less expensive than the SEE-MVR system, as was shown in the publication by Onishi et al [50].…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important aspect to consider is the amount of water recovered by each technology. In this way, a high rate of recovery should be obtained with the optimal configuration, while the brine removal should be near the zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) strategy [50,51]. Thermal desalination technologies allow recovering approximately 76.7% of water (regarding the inlet flow), while membrane distillation allows recovering approximately 33.5% of water.…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison with other MD configurations, DCMD has the highest proportion of heat conduction loss through the membrane. Furthermore, since the vapour condenses directly into the permeate stream, it is not easy to recover the latent heat from the permeate stream by a multistage design, which has limited gained output ratio (can also be defined by Equation (16)) to less than 1 [ 70 , 71 ].…”
Section: Mechanism Of Heat Transfer and Mass Transfer Through Poromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case studies show that WPC can be reduced by 38.1% [20]. An air gap membrane distillation module with energy recovery can be used for desalination experiments and the system can be optimized using response surface methodology [21]. The parameters of cold feed inlet temperature (T1), hot feed inlet temperature (T3) and feed flow rate (F) are considered, and the membrane flux (J) and thermal efficiency (GOR) are the targets [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%