2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization of multiple satisfaction levels in portfolio decision analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the fact that the original rough set theory cannot process the preferential relationships between attributes [33,34], Greco, Matarazzo, Slowinski, et al [35] expanded upon the theory. The expansion involves the replacement of indiscernibility relationships with dominant relationships in the rough approximation of decision attributes [36,37]. This replacement prevents the paradoxes that may be caused in the processing of sequential information by using the original RSA, which is based on equivalence relationships [38,39].…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that the original rough set theory cannot process the preferential relationships between attributes [33,34], Greco, Matarazzo, Slowinski, et al [35] expanded upon the theory. The expansion involves the replacement of indiscernibility relationships with dominant relationships in the rough approximation of decision attributes [36,37]. This replacement prevents the paradoxes that may be caused in the processing of sequential information by using the original RSA, which is based on equivalence relationships [38,39].…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach is more recent and takes into account the preferences of the DM using an interactive procedure. It has been proposed by [27] and applied to portfolio decision problems in [6].…”
Section: Multiobjective Methodsologies For the Space -Time Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 10 we report here the corresponding strategies. Let us underline that to facilitate the understanding of the solution for the DMs, each strategy could be presented to the DM, with some graphs representing, with histograms, the values of F a,l (x) as shown in [6]. For the sake of the space we do not report here these representations.…”
Section: A Multiobjective Interactive Optimization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…difference between performed a thorough comparative [16] assessment of different bi-objective models as well as multi-objective one, in terms of the performance and robustness of the whole set of Pareto optimal portfolios. Barbati et al [17] proposed a different approach that enables the Decision Maker (DM) to control the distribution of good evaluations on different criteria over the projects composing a portfolio. With this aim, for each criterion we fix a certain number of reference levels corresponding to the qualitative satisfaction degrees.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we studied for a data set from Iran's market to find out the trade-off between Lingo software and MATLAB. That maximizes the return on investment of the investor [17].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%